Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BNGP v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCAFC 111 Appeal from: BNGP v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCA 878
File number(s): NSD 649 of 2022
Judgment of: PERRY, BROMWICH AND KENNETT JJ
Date of judgment: 14 July 2023
Catchwords: MIGRATION – challenge to Minister's decision under s 501A(2) of the Migration Act, to refuse to grant a protection visa to the appellant on the ground that it was not in the national interest – where Minister did not consider consequence of potential breach of Australia's international human rights obligations for Australia's international reputation – whether case distinguishable from Full Court decisions in Minister for Immigration, v CWY20 and ENT19 v Minister for Home Affairs – whether it is contestable that indefinite detention is a breach of Australia's international obligations under various instruments to which Australia is a party – whether it is legally unreasonable for the Minister to not have regard to an arguable but contestable breach of Australia's international legal obligations that arises as a consequence of the Minister's decision – appeal dismissed MIGRATION – whether CWY20 and ENT19 impliedly overruled by High Court in Plaintiff M1 – whether CWY20 and ENT19 clearly and plainly wrong EVIDENCE – whether primary judge complied with s 144(4) of the Evidence Act – whether adequate notice of matter of common knowledge that Ministers may change and Ministers may change their mind – whether Minister impermissibly had regard to future events – where appellant had ample opportunity to address issues of common knowledge
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate