Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
CCU21 v Minister for Home Affairs (Costs) [2023] FCAFC 112 Appeal from: CCU21 v Minister for Home Affairs [2022] FCA 28
File number: NSD 72 of 2022
Judgment of: PERRAM, HALLEY AND GOODMAN JJ
Date of judgment: 19 July 2023
Catchwords: COSTS – application for each party to bear its own costs on appeal and at trial – where Appellant successful on appeal in relation to non-revocation decision but not initial cancellation decision
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 501(3), 501(6) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 39.04
Cases cited: Acting Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs v CWY20 [2021] FCAFC 195; 288 FCR 565 Ashby v Slipper (No 2) [2014] FCAFC 67; 314 ALR 84 CCU21 v Minister for Home Affairs [2023] FCAFC 87 ENT19 v Minister for Home Affairs [2021] FCAFC 217; 289 FCR 100
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Number of paragraphs: 15
Date of last submissions: 3 July 2023
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Counsel for the Appellant: Mr T Brennan SC, Ms K Heath and Ms C Brain
Solicitor for the Appellant: SBA Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr P Herzfeld SC and Mr J Wherrett
Solicitor for the Respondent: Australian Government Solicitor
ORDERS NSD 72 of 2022
BETWEEN: CCU21 Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR HOME AFFAIRS Respondent
order made by: PERRAM, HALLEY AND GOODMAN JJ DATE OF ORDER: 19 July 2023
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate