Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Manebona v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCAFC 116 Appeal from: Manebona v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCA 730
File number: QUD 231 of 2022
Judgment of: LOGAN, RANGIAH AND GOODMAN JJ
Date of judgment: 26 July 2023
Catchwords: MIGRATION – Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – where Administrative Appeals Tribunal affirmed the Minister's decision not to revoke cancellation of visa – where primary judge found no jurisdictional error – whether the Tribunal overlooked "health" issue under para 9.2 of Direction 90 – whether the Tribunal denied the appellant procedural fairness – construction of para 9.3 of Direction 90 – held appellant was denied procedural fairness – appeal allowed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 499(1), 499(2A), 500(1)(ba), 501(3A), 501(6)(a), 501(7)(c), 501CA(3)(b), 501CA(4), 501CA(4)(b)(i), 501CA(4)(b)(ii) and Directions 21, 56, 65 79 and 90
Cases cited: Aksu v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 514; (2001) 65 ALD 667 Applicant S270/2019 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2020] HCA 32; (2020) 383 ALR 194 Calvey v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCAFC 104 CGX20 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs (No 2) [2020] FCA 1842 CGX20 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCAFC 69; (2021) 284 FCR 416 Cockrell v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2008] FCAFC 160; (2008) 171 FCR 345 Commissioner for Australian Capital Territory Revenue v Alphaone Pty Ltd (1994) 49 FCR 576 DKN20 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCAFC 69; (2021) 285 FCR 1 DKN20 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs (2021) 285 FCR 1 Holloway v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCA 1126 Kumar v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCAFC 94 LRMM v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 1039 Manebona v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCA 730 Matthews v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCAFC 146 Minister for Home Affairs v HSKJ (2018) 266 FCR 591 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZMTA (2019) 264 CLR 421 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li (2013) 249 CLR 332 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Bhardwaj (2002) 209 CLR 597 Nathanson v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCAFC 172; (2020) 281 FCR 23 Nathanson v Minister for Home Affairs [2022] HCA 26; (2022) 96 ALJR 737 Plaintiff M1/2021 v Minister for Home Affairs [2022] HCA 17; (2022) 400 ALR 417 R v Commonwealth Conciliation and Arbitration Commission; Ex parte The Angliss Group (1969) 122 CLR 546 Ruhl v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 648; (2001) 184 ALR 401 Sullivan v Department of Transport (1978) 20 ALR 323 SZBEL v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2006) 228 CLR 152 SZTMD v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 150; (2015) 150 ALD 34 TGWR v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCAFC 200
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate