Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Taylor v Nationwide News Pty Limited [2023] FCAFC 117 Appeal from: Taylor v Nationwide News Pty Limited (No 2) [2022] FCA 149; (2022) 404 ALR 266
File number(s): NSD 146 of 2022
Judgment of: WIGNEY, O'CALLAGHAN AND JACKSON JJ
Date of judgment: 25 July 2023
Catchwords: DEFAMATION – appeal against primary judge's findings that no imputations conveyed in trial by judge alone – whether primary judge erred in finding that imputations not conveyed – appeal dismissed
Legislation: Defamation Act 2005 (NSW) s 8
Cases cited: Bazzi v Dutton (2022) 289 FCR 1 Boensch v Pascoe (2019) 268 CLR 593 Drummoyne Municipal Council v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (1990) 21 NSWLR 135 Favell v Queensland Newspapers Pty Ltd [2005] HCA 52; (2005) 79 ALJR 1716 Gatto v Australian Broadcasting Corporation [2022] VSCA 66 Herron v HarperCollins Publishers Australia Pty Ltd [2022] FCAFC 68 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd v Rivkin [2003] HCA 50; (2003) 77 ALJR 1657 Lewis v Daily Telegraph Ltd [1964] AC 234 Massoud v Nationwide News Pty Ltd (2022) 109 NSWLR 468 Rush v Nationwide News Pty Ltd (No 7) [2019] FCA 496 Reader's Digest Services Pty Ltd v Lamb (1982) 150 CLR 500 Taylor v Nationwide News Limited (No 2) [2022] FCA 149; (2022) 404 ALR 266 Trkulja v Google LLC (2018) 263 CLR 149 V'landys v Australian Broadcasting Corporation [2023] FCAFC 80 Warren v Coombes (1979) 142 CLR 531
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate