Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Shi v Minister for Home Affairs [2023] FCAFC 136 Appeal from: Shi v Minister for Home Affairs [2022] FCA 708
File number(s): NSD 531 of 2022
Judgment of: SNADEN, ANDERSON AND GOODMAN JJ
Date of judgment: 16 August 2023
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal – judicial review – refusal to revoke cancellation of the appellant's visa – appellant made a representation that removal would place him at a considerable risk of suicide – whether Minister failed to engage with that representation in the requisite manner – appeal dismissed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 501, 501CA, 501G Criminal Code Compilation Act 1913 (WA), s 220
Cases cited: Carrascalao v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 107; (2017) 252 FCR 352 ECE21 v Minister for Home Affairs [2023] FCAFC 52 Ezegbe v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 216; (2019) 164 ALD 139 GBV18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCAFC 17; (2020) 274 FCR 202 Hands v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 225; (2018) 267 FCR 628 Minister for Home Affairs v Omar [2019] FCAFC 188; (2019) 272 FCR 589 Plaintiff M1/2021 v Minister for Home Affairs [2022] HCA 17; (2022) 96 ALJR 497 Shi v Minister for Home Affairs [2022] FCA 708
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate