Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
King v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCAFC 152 Appeal from: King v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCA 1319
File number: WAD 248 of 2022
Judgment of: ANDERSON, FEUTRILL AND RAPER JJ
Date of judgment: 8 September 2023
Catchwords: MIGRATION - where mandatory cancellation of visa on character grounds - appeal of Administrative Appeals Tribunal affirmed a decision of a delegate not to revoke the cancellation - where an application for judicial review of the Tribunal's decision was dismissed by a judge of this Court - where appellant sought leave to raise appeal grounds not relied upon before the primary judge - whether, on the basis of new grounds, the Tribunal's reasoning was illogical, irrational or unreasonable or the Tribunal failed to evaluate the appellant's representations
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 189, 197C, 198, 476A(1)(b), 499(1), 499(2A), 500(1)(ba), 501(3A), 501(6), 501(7), 501CA, 501CA(3), 501CA(4), 501CA(4)(b)(ii)
Cases cited: BZD17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 94; (2018) 263 FCR 292 DAO16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 2; (2018) 258 FCR 175 Guttridge v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCA 229 FHHM v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCAFC 19 LRMM v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 1039 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Singh [2014] FCAFC 1; (2014) 231 FCR 437 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Stretton [2016] FCAFC 11; (2016) 237 FCR 1 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Sabharwal [2018] FCAFC 160 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li [2013] HCA 18; (2013) 249 CLR 332 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZIAI [2009] HCA 39; (2009) 259 ALR 429 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZMDS [2010] HCA 16; (2010) 240 CLR 611 Nathanson v Minister for Home Affairs [2022] HCA 26; (2022) 403 ALR 398 Nguyen v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Service and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 985 O'Brien v Komesaroff [1982] HCA 33; (1982) 150 CLR 310 Plaintiff M1/2021 v Minister for Home Affairs [2022] HCA 17; (2022) 400 ALR 417 Tohi v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCAFC 125; (2021) 285 FCR 187 Uelese v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] HCA 15; (2015) 256 CLR 203 Vaokakala v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 1979 VUAX v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 158; (2004) 238 FCR 588
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate