Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Kamal v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCAFC 159 Appeal from: Kamal v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCA 200
File number: VID 226 of 2023
Judgment of: RARES, BROMWICH AND RAPER JJ
Date of judgment: 28 September 2023
Catchwords: MIGRATION – where appellant's visa was cancelled under s 501CA(4) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – where an appeal of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal affirmed a decision of a delegate not to revoke the cancellation – where an application for judicial review of the Tribunal's decision was dismissed by a judge of this Court – where the sole ground of appeal is that the primary judge erred by not giving the appellant a reasonable opportunity to present his case and to inspect documents to which the Tribunal proposed to have regard in accordance with s 39(1) of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) – held: no error on the part of the primary judge, appeal dismissed
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) ss 39(1), 43(2A) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 501CA(4), 500(6L), 501G(1) Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) reg 2.55
Cases cited: Applicant NAFF of 2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2004) 221 CLR 1 Daw v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCA 705 Jagroop v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCAFC 123; 225 FCR 482 Khalil v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 151; 271 FCR 326 Kohli v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 540; 74 AAR 433 National Disability Insurance Agency v WRMF [2020] FCAFC 79; 276 FCR 415 Sullivan v Department of Transport (1978) 20 ALR 323
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate