Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Tapiki v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCAFC 167 Application for judicial review from: Tapiki and Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2021] AATA 1228
File number: WAD 65 of 2023
Judgment of: KATZMANN, SARAH C DERRINGTON AND KENNETT JJ
Date of judgment: 19 October 2023
Catchwords: MIGRATION – Application for writ of habeas corpus and declaration that item 4 of Sch 1 to Migration Amendment (Aggregate Sentences) Act 2023 (Cth) (Amending Act) is invalid – where previous Full Court judgment held cancellation of applicant's visa invalid as applicant's aggregate sentence of 12 months' imprisonment not within scope of s 501(7)(c) of Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (Act) – where Act subsequently amended by Amending Act with retrospective effect to treat aggregate sentence as equivalent to sentence for single offence for purposes of s 501(7)(c) CONSTITUTIONAL LAW – Whether impugned provisions of Amending Act constitute usurpation of, or interference with, Commonwealth judicial power – whether Amending Act impermissibly purports to "reverse" Full Court judgment – whether Amending Act has effect of withdrawing or fettering entrenched jurisdiction of High Court under s 75(iii) and (v) of Constitution CONSTITUTIONAL LAW – Whether Amending Act extinguishes a cause of action for false imprisonment such that it effects an acquisition of property other than on just terms contrary to s 51(xxxi) of Constitution – where s 3B of Act creates right to receive compensation where "this Act" would otherwise not be valid as a result of an acquisition of property – whether acquisition of property resulting from Amending Act "results" from "this Act"
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate