Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
University of Sydney v National Tertiary Education Industry Union [2024] FCAFC 57 File number: NSD 1129 of 2022
Judgment of: PERRAM, LEE AND KENNETT JJ
Date of judgment: 17 May 2024
Catchwords: INDUSTRIAL LAW – university – right to intellectual freedom – appeal of remitter judgments – where primary judgment appealed to Full Court – where Full Court allowed appeal and remitted matters to primary judge for hearing and determination – alleged contravention of s 50 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) – whether open to appellant to raise issue of onus of proof where issue had not been substantively raised before primary judge, in the first appeal or on remittal – whether primary judge erred by proceeding on basis that appellant bore onus of proof – whether onus of proof discharged – whether primary judge gave adequate reasons – whether second respondent's comments constituted exercises of intellectual freedom – whether second respondent committed "serious misconduct" by disobeying lawful directions in making the comments that were alleged exercises of intellectual freedom
Legislation: Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) ss 50, 340, 539, 545, 570 University of Sydney Act 1989 (NSW) s 6
Cases cited: Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority v Arnica Pty Ltd (No 2) [2022] FCA 815; 293 FCR 533 Avel Pty Ltd v Multicoin Amusements Pty Ltd (1990) 171 CLR 88 Coulton v Holcombe (1986) 162 CLR 1 Fair Work Ombudsman v National Union of Workers [2019] FCA 1826 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 Iyer v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1788 James Cook University v Ridd [2020] FCAFC 123; 278 FCR 566 National Tertiary Education Industry Union v University of Sydney [2020] FCA 1709; 302 IR 272 National Tertiary Education Industry Union v University of Sydney [2021] FCAFC 159; 309 IR 159 National Tertiary Education Industry Union v University of Sydney [2022] FCA 1265; 318 IR 460 National Tertiary Education Industry Union v University of Sydney [2023] FCA 537 National Tertiary Education Industry Union v University of Sydney (No 2) [2021] FCAFC 184 Ridd v James Cook University [2021] HCA 32; 274 CLR 495 Russell v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (No 3) [2023] FCA 1223 Tomlinson v Ramsey Food Processing Pty Ltd [2015] HCA 28; 256 CLR 507 Toyota Motor Corporation Australia Ltd v Marmara [2014] FCAFC 84; 222 FCR 152 Vines v Djordjevitch (1955) 91 CLR 512 Water Board v Moustakas (1988) 180 CLR 491
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate