Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Korat v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2024] FCAFC 59 File number(s): NSD 1537 of 2023
Judgment of: RANGIAH, THAWLEY AND SHARIFF JJ
Date of judgment: 24 May 2024
Catchwords: MIGRATION – procedural fairness – where Administrative Appeals Tribunal decided not to revoke the cancellation of the appellant's visa – where delegate concluded that the "best interests of children" consideration weighed in favour of revocation – where respondent did not advance a positive case that the "best interests of children" consideration weighed in favour of revocation and made a concession in closing submissions before the Tribunal that the "best interests of children" consideration weighed in favour of revocation – where Tribunal found the consideration weighed against revocation – whether Tribunal denied procedural fairness – Tribunal failed to afford the appellant procedural fairness – appeal allowed on grounds not argued at trial PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - where appellant sought leave to raise new grounds of judicial review on appeal – leave granted on the basis that the new grounds had sufficient merit
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) Migration Act 1958 (Cth)
Cases cited: Bale v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 646 Comcare v Fiedler [2001] FCA 1810; 115 FCR 328 Commissioner for Australian Capital Territory Revenue v Alphaone Pty Ltd [1994] FCA 293; 49 FCR 576 FCFY v Minister for Home Affairs (No 2) [2019] FCA 1990 FYBR v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 185; 272 FCR 454 Korat v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCA 1333 LPDT v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2024] HCA 12 Manebona v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCAFC 116; 298 FCR 516 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v WZARH [2015] HCA 40; 256 CLR 326 Nathanson v Minister for Home Affairs [2022] HCA 26; 276 CLR 80 Perpetual Trustee Company (Canberra) Ltd v Commissioner for Australian Capital Territory Revenue [1994] FCA 367; 50 FCR 405 Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs; Ex parte Lam [2003] HCA 6; 214 CLR 1 Saeed v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2010] HCA 23; 241 CLR 252 Somaghi v Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs [1991] FCA 501; 31 FCR 100 SZBEL v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2006] HCA 63; 228 CLR 152
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate