Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Hastie Group Limited (in liq) v Multiplex Constructions Pty Ltd (Formerly Brookfield Multiplex Constructions Pty Ltd) (Leave to Appeal) [2024] FCAFC 61 Appeal from: Hastie Group Limited (in liq) v Multiplex Constructions Pty Ltd (Formerly Brookfield Multiplex Constructions Pty Ltd) (No 3) [2022] FCA 1280 Hastie Group Limited (in liq) v Multiplex Constructions Pty Ltd (Formerly Brookfield Multiplex Constructions Pty Ltd) (No 4) [2022] FCA 1575
File number: VID 41 of 2023
Judgment of: PERRAM, STEWART AND BUTTON JJ
Date of judgment: 21 May 2024
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for leave to appeal – where primary judge found that Applicants ran an 'all-or-nothing' case in respect of their entitlement to bank guarantee proceeds – where primary judge dismissed that case entirely – whether claim for surplus proceeds also run below
Division: General Division
Registry: Victoria
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Corporations and Corporate Insolvency
Number of paragraphs: 12
Date of hearing: 20-21 May 2024
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate