Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Seven Network (Operations) Limited v 7-Eleven Inc [2024] FCAFC 65 Appeal from: Application for leave to appeal: Seven Network (Operations) Limited v 7-Eleven Inc [2023] FCA 608
File number: NSD 598 of 2023
Judgment of: BURLEY, JACKSON AND DOWNES JJ
Date of judgment: 27 May 2024
Catchwords: TRADE MARKS - non-use - Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) s 92(4)(b) - whether primary judge erred in finding that registered trade mark owner had not established use during relevant period - use in relation to particular goods and services alleged to have occurred by display of mark on website - use partially established for one category of goods and services - use not established for remaining categories of goods and services TRADE MARKS - non-use - Trade Marks Act s 101(3) - discretion to permit mark to remain on the Register in relation to remaining categories of goods and services - discretion not exercised in favour of trade mark owner
Legislation: Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) ss 7, 17, 92, 100, 101, 104, 120, 195
Cases cited: Aldi Foods Pty Ltd v Moroccanoil Israel Ltd [2018] FCAFC 93; (2018) 261 FCR 301 Anchorage Capital Partners Pty Limited v ACPA Pty Ltd [2018] FCAFC 6; (2018) 259 FCR 514 Anheuser-Busch, Inc v Budějovický Budvar, Národní Podnik [2002] FCA 390; (2002) 56 IPR 182 Austin, Nichols & Co Inc v Lodestar Anstalt [2012] FCAFC 8; (2012) 202 FCR 490 Coca-Cola Co v All-Fect Distributors Ltd [1999] FCA 1721; (1999) 96 FCR 107 Decor Corporation Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc [1991] FCA 655; (1991) 33 FCR 397 E & J Gallo Winery v Lion Nathan Australia Pty Limited [2010] HCA 15; (2010) 241 CLR 144 Halal Certification Authority Pty Limited v Flujo Sanguineo Holdings Pty Limited [2023] FCAFC 175; (2023) 300 FCR 478 House v The King [1936] HCA 40; (1936) 55 CLR 499 Johnson & Johnson Australia Pty Ltd v Sterling Pharmaceuticals Pty Ltd (1991) 30 FCR 326 Mark Foys Ltd v Davies Co-op and Co Ltd (Tub Happy case) [1956] HCA 41; (1956) 95 CLR 190 McHattan v Australian Specialised Vehicle Systems Pty Ltd (1996) 34 IPR 537 PDP Capital Pty Ltd v Grasshopper Ventures Pty Ltd [2021] FCAFC 128; (2021) 285 FCR 598 Pepsico Australia Pty Ltd v Kettle Chip Company Pty Ltd (1996) 33 IPR 161 RB (Hygiene Home) Australia Pty Ltd v Henkel Australia Pty Ltd [2024] FCAFC 10 Registrar Of Trade Marks v Woolworths [1999] FCA 1020; (1999) 93 FCR 365 Self Care IP Holdings Pty Ltd v Allergan Australia Pty Ltd [2023] HCA 8 Sensis Pty Ltd v Senses Direct Mail and Fulfillment Pty Ltd [2019] FCA 719; (2019) 141 IPR 463 Seven Network (Operations) Limited v 7-Eleven Inc [2021] ATMO 58; (2021) 164 IPR 370 Shell Company of Australia Ltd v Esso Standard Oil (Australia) Ltd [1963] HCA 66; (1963) 109 CLR 407 TiVo Inc v Vivo International Corporation Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 252 Warren v Coombes [1979] HCA 9; (1979) 142 CLR 531
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate