Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
RDYQ v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2024] FCAFC 108 Appeal from: RDYQ v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2024] FCA 254
File number(s): NSD 418 of 2024
Judgment of: MURPHY, ABRAHAM AND MCEVOY JJ
Date of judgment: 23 August 2024
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal – where Administrative Appeals Tribunal affirmed Minister's decision not to revoke cancellation of visa –Tribunal determined it was not satisfied that there was "another reason" to revoke the cancellation of appellant's visa under s 501CA(4)(b)(ii) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – whether Tribunal complied with Direction 90 – whether Direction 90 requires an express finding of likelihood of a non-citizen engaging in further criminal or other serious conduct – appeal dismissed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 499, 501, 501CA
Cases cited: Chen v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 46 Jattan v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2024] FCA 866 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 RNSQ v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCA 1111
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Number of paragraphs: 17
Date of hearing: 13 August 2024
Counsel for the Appellant: Hamish P T Bevan SC and Chris Honnery
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate