Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia Vehicle Monitoring Systems Pty Limited v SARB Management Group Pty Ltd trading as Database Consultants Australia (Costs) [2024] FCAFC 155 Appeal from:
File number(s): NSD 637 of 2024
Judgment of: PERRAM, DOWNES AND O'SULLIVAN JJ
Date of judgment: 4 December 2024
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for leave to appeal from costs orders made by trial judge – where trial judge made costs orders which differed from those proposed by the parties – application refused PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – extent of reasons to be provided by intermediate appellate court on application for leave to appeal
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 24(1A)
Aldi Foods Pty Ltd v Moroccanoil Israel Ltd [2018] FCAFC 93; 261 FCR 301 Boensch v Pascoe [2019] HCA 49; 268 CLR 593 Commonwealth v Milledge (1953) 90 CLR 157 Harvard Nominees Pty Ltd v Dimension Agriculture Pty Ltd (in liq) [2023] FCAFC 140; 299 FCR 224 Cases cited: In the Marriage of Borriello (1989) 97 FLR 211 Kitchen v Director of Professional Services Review [2023] FCAFC 160 SARB Management Group Pty Ltd T/A Database Consultants Australia v Vehicle Monitoring Systems Pty Limited [2024] FCAFC 6 UBS AG v Tyne [2018] HCA 45; 265 CLR 77 Vehicle Monitoring Systems Pty Limited v SARB Management Group Pty Ltd trading as Database Consultants Australia (No 11) [2024] FCA 456
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate