Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Rusanov v Commissioner of Taxation [2025] FCAFC 11 Appeal from: Rusanov v Commissioner of Taxation [2024] FCA 777
File number: QUD 459 of 2024
Judgment of: LOGAN, PERRY AND WHEATLEY JJ
Date of judgment: 12 February 2025
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 44 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 25
Cases cited: Rusanov v Commissioner of Taxation [2024] FCA 777 Rusanova v Commissioner of Taxation [2023] AATA 2782
Division: General Division
Registry: Queensland
National Practice Area: Taxation
Number of paragraphs: 11
Date of hearing: Heard on the papers
Counsel for the Appellants: The Appellant appeared in person
Solicitor for the Respondents: McInnes Wilson Lawyers
ORDERS QUD 459 of 2024
BETWEEN: MAXIM RUSANOV First Appellant
LIUDMILA RUSANOVA Second Appellant
AND: COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION First Respondent
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL Second Respondent
order made by: LOGAN, PERRY AND WHEATLEY JJ DATE OF ORDER: 12 FEBRUARY 2025
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appellants' interlocutory application filed on 30 January 2025 for the adjournment of the hearing of their appeal, presently listed for hearing on 12 March 2025 (adjournment application) be heard and determined on the papers. 2. The adjournment application be granted. 3. The hearing of the appeal and the notice of objection to competency be adjourned to the next sittings of the Full Court, to be heard on a date to be fixed by the Court after consultation with the parties (the new hearing date). 4. The listing of the appeal and the notice of objection to competency for hearing on 12 March 2025 and the interlocutory directions dated 6 December 2024 be vacated. 5. The Registrar make such further interlocutory directions as may be necessary for the hearing of the appeal and the notice of objection to competency on the new hearing date. 6. A Pro Bono Referral Certificate be issued by the Registrar to the end of the provision of pro bono legal assistance to the appellants. 7. Costs be reserved. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate