Federal Court of Australia
~~
IN THE FIDER VS COUNT OF AUSTPALTA
Ce ee
.. _OENERAD Leeeesevees DIVISION
BETWETL
AND
JUDGE(S) wvaING ORDER : FRANKI J. DATE OF ONDER : 6 July 1977
WHERE MADS : Sydney
T™HE COURT ORD YS THAT:
1,. The Order Nis2 be dismissed.
2. Applicant to vay the respondent's
if not agreed. 3.
Date Entered:
No. G.f
1D... of 1977
AUSFINLD PTY, LIVITED '
erecese
eo ed
eeecsene
aacee
See er er ceceeeseras
LEYLAND MOTOR CORPORATICH
«OF. AUSTPALTA LINITYD. 0... eevee neces ececse se RESONANT |,
costs;
costs
to be taxed
Pek A anaes aD kiana phelalaliee eee
. Neh ali sms or meets a, mathe tnn AAD vn BA tna tacos Albi a Meveeh at LIE tan DIE a OIA. Ne a un OA RIOD Se etn Rb Yack. Ranke ae
CATCH ACR DS
Trade Fractices Act 1974-1976 - angunction - Section 60 - Section 45(2) ~ Section 51(2)(a) - interpretation of s.51(2)(a) - meaning of "employees"
~ Seccion 46(1) - taking advantage of pover.
Ausfield Pty. Limited Vv.
Leyland Motor Corporation Of Australia Limited
G. No. 40 of 1977 Eefore Franki J.
Sydney 6 July 1977.
%
aay
ee ee ee
some
wave ane
at Bd et LOU ON BU. ie aA
GLNTFRAL DIVICTON No. G-40 of 1977.
Betvcen
AUSPIELD PTY. LIMITED
Applicant And esponcenl REASONS POR JUDGE NT FRANRK™
ELIVeh=D: 6 July 1977.
The applicant, Ausfieid Pty. Limited seeke injgunctrios
under the provisions of s.@0 of the Trade Fractices Act 1O74~=1S7€ ("the Act") restraining the respondent, Leyvlend Mctoi Corporation of Australia Limited, trom engaging in conduse
cr
alleged to be contrary to the provisions of ss.f& and "6 of +1
wy
Act.
The applicant's only business is that of cisetribvior 3n New South Wales of automotive parts and accessories obtained frat the respondent. The applicant is a wnotiy owned subsidiary cf LNC Industries Limited. The respondent 1s the only initial source of such parts and accessories in New South Waies. The applicant is not the only channel by which such parts and accessories are distributed in New South Wales from the responcent. Dealers may purchase parts and accessories direct from the respondent's retail dealer Givasion called "Leyperts" and, ir addition, there is at least one other dz:strabutor for the respondent from whom certain parts and accessorics may be on veine'
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate