Federal Court of Australia
CATCHWORDS
INDUSTRIAL LAW - BREACH OF AN AWARD - UNDERPAYMENT
OF WAGES - BREACHES ARISING OUT OF A COURSE OF CONDUCT - BREACHES TO BE TREATED AS CONSTITUTING A SINGLE BREACH - POWER OF COURT TO ORDER PAYMENT WHEN NO PENALTY CAN BE IMPOSED - CONCILIATION AND ARBITRATION ACT 1904 s. 119 (1)
(14), (1B), (1C) (3).
John Richard Quinn v. Barry Martin
W.A. Nos 1-6 of 1977
Coram: Smithers, Evatt, Keely, JJ.
Perth
16th September 1977.
If THD FEDERAL COURT OF sUSTRALTA
WESTeRi LUSTRALTAT DICTRICT RuGIsTay Woh. Nos. 1 - 6 of 1977
i
TsWUSTRIAL DIVISION
In the matter of -
Tis COMCILIATION AMD ARBITRATION ACT 1904
Between -
JCUIN RICHARD QUINN Clainent
- and - BARRY MARTI Respondent {MDs5ns OF SiTTHms, J. iy BEY CE s BYATT, Jo KEULY, J. DATE: 16th September, 1977 PLACE: PaRS! ORDERS OF TEE COURT: The Court orders that -
1. The Respondent, Barry Martin, pay to Lester Herbert liayes the sum of U3.314671.
2. The Respondent, Barry Martin, pey to John Stuart Shepherd the sum of $1,804.94.
—
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALL: ») WESTERN AUSTRiLIAN DISTRICT REGISTRY W.A. Nos. 1 - 6 of 1977
INDUSTRIAL DIVISION In the matter of —-
THE CONCILIATION AUD ARBITRATION ACT 190.
Between ~ JOHN RICHARD QUIN Clazmant - and - BARRY IARTIU Respondent 16th September, 1977 SNITHRS, LVATT, and KESLY, JJ.
REASONS FOR JUDGiNT
In six summonses (Nos. WA. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ond 6 of 1977) the claamant, Jonn Richard Quinn, an inspector appcinted pursuant to S.125 of the Conerliaticn and arbitration Act 1904 (the fict) seeks orders under $.119 imposing penrlties upon Barry Martin, the respondent, for breaches of
c1.26 (Wages), cl.28 (Overtime) and cl.29 (Special Allowances) of the Professional Divers! Avavd 1974 (the Averd) in respect of roneys due to tivo employees of the respondent, namely, Lester Herbert Mayes end
Jchn Stuart Shepherd for various periods set out in the respective summonses. The Court was asked to make further orders pursuant to $.119(3)} that the respondent pay to such employees amewits of pactacvlarised wnderpayments to which they were entitled under the Avacd, lotelling, in respect of lir.Nayes, 35,314.71 end in respect of Iir. Shepherd, $1,804.94.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate