Federal Court of Australia
NU (
: CATCHWORDS \ 3 719 — ,
Industrial law - interpretation of award - The Vehicle Industry - Repair, Services and Retail - Award, 1976 - payment for time whilst employee taking annual leave - whether entitled to over-award payment - Conciliation
and Arbitration Act 1904 s.110.
Re The Vehicle Builders Emplovees' Federation of Australia and an Application for an Interpretation of The Vehicle Industry - Repair, Services and Retail - Award, 1976
V. No. 39 of 1978
Coram: Keely, J.
Date: 9 March 1979
Place: Melbourne.
9/3/74
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
INDUSTRIAL DIVISION V. No. 39 of 1978
were
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
IN THE MATTER of the Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904
and
IN THE MATTER of The Vehicle
Industry - Repair, Services and Retail - Award, 1976
and
IN THE MATTER of an Application by The Vehicle Builders Employees' Federation of Australia for an interpretation of
the above Award
JUDGE MAKING ORDER: KEELY, J.
DATE OF ORDER: 9 March 1979
WHERE MADE: Melbourne
THE COURT ORDERS
That upon the true meaning and intent of sub-clause 27(k)
of The Vehicle Industry - Repair, Services and Retail -
Award, 1976 Heaths Motors Pty Ltd is obliged to pay to
an employee before going on annual leave the wages he would have received, including any over-award payment, in respect of the ordinary time he would have worked had he not been on
leave during the relevant period.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA ) ) V. No. 39 of 1978 INDUSTRIAL DIVISION )
IN THE MATTER of the Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904
and
IN THE MATTER of The Vehicle Industry - Repair, Services and Retail - Award, 1976
and
IN THE MATTER of an Application by The Vehicle Builders Employees' Federation of Australia for an interpretation of the above Award '
REASONS FOR JUUGMENT
9 March 1979 KEELY, J.
This is an application by The Vehicle Builders Employees' Federation of Australia (the Federation) for an interpretation of sub-clause 27(k)(i) of The Vehicle Industry - Repair, Services and Retail - Award, 1976 (the award). Miss Maureen Hickey of counsel appeared for the applicant and Mr Spicer of counsel appeared for Heaths Motors Pty Ltd and the Victorian Automobile Chamber of Commerce (V.A.C.C.). There was no appearance for any other party bound by the award, although affidavits were filed as to service on the organisations of employers and organisations of employees.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate