Federal Court of Australia
CATCHWORDS
Practice and procedure - crimin Practices Act - Federal Court o
al matters - Trade £ Australia Act -
jurisdiction of trial judge to criminal matter - jurisdiction
and determine a case stated in
n
o alan Fol Yada Ac
K
+ c
it)
deral Co +t of An aera vo 6 OL
25,26,28, 33.
Trade Practices Act 1974
tyr tx
£
24 - 30 31-4
S.A. Nos.G 6 - 12, S.A. Nos.G 13 - 23,
CORAM:
Melbourne
21 May 1979.
state a case ina of Full Court to hear
a criminal matter.
be KD ~J ch Le) ur ° oe ~XO bo ao . bo a ~
SS.53,79,86,163.
Smithers, Franki and Northrop JJ.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
GENERAL DIVISION
S.A. Nos G6 - 41 inclusive of 1978
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
IN THE MATTER of the Trade Practices Act 1974
BETWEEN:
CRAIG JACKSON HENDERSON Informant and PTONEPR HOMES PTY. LTD. Defendant (S.A. Nos. G 6-12, 24-30)
AND IN THE MATTER of the Trade Practices Act 1974
~ BETWEEN: CRAIG JACKSON HENDERSON Informant and PIONEER AGDENCIES PTY. LTD. Defendant (S.A. Nos. G 13-23, 31-41). ORDER
JUDGES MAKING ORDER:
DATE:
WHERE MADE:
ORDER:
Smithers, Frank1 and Northrop JJ.
21 May, 1979
Melbourne
Case stated struck out,
CN S.A. Nos. G6-G41 inclusive of 1978 SOUTH AUSTRALTA DISTRICT RUGISTRY
IN THE SITTER of the Trade Practiccs
Act 1974
BETWEEN: CRAIG JACKCON RENDERCON
AND: PIOMFER HOMES PTY, ETD.
Defendant
(S.A. Nos. G6-12, 24-30)
AND IN THE MATTER of the Trade
Practices Act 1974
"BETWEEN: CRAIG JACKSON ERIDERSON
Informant AND: PIONERR AGENCIES PLY. LTD. Defendant
(S.A. Nos. G.13-23, 31-41)
SMITHERS J.
21 May 1979
REASONS FOP TUDGVENT
This special case was stated at the regucst of both parti on 10 October 1978. It concerns 56 informations issued under
the Trade Practices Act 1974 against the defendents. These
informations are describcd in paragraph 1 of the special case
which reads:-
"Thais Special Case 1s stated 1n proceedings anstitutcd by 36 informations laid by Craig Jackson Henderson on the 4th aay of August 1978. Upon separete 1unformations the defendant Pioneer Homes Pty. Ltd. and the defendant Pioneer Agencies Pty. Ltd. were cach charged un respect of newspaper advertisements with 7 breaches of section 53(e) of the Trade Practices Act 1974 and (an respect of tne Same aavertisements) with 7 breaches of section 53(f7) of the said Act. In addition, the defendant Pronecr Agencies Pty. Ltc, was charged in respect of other newspaper advertisements in seperate informations with 4 further breaches of section 53(c) of the said Act and with 4 further breacnes of Section 53(g) of the sard Act. Annexed hereto and marked with the letter 'A' are coples of tne said informations."
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate