Federal Court of Australia
LS
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION
Coram: Franki J.
4 July 1979 Sydney
FRANKI J.
BETWEEN :
AND:
Cc. No.44 of 1978
Ne
TRADE PRACTICES COMMISSION Plaintiff T.N.T. MANAGEMENT PTY. LIMITED First Defendant BRAMBLES HOLDINGS LIMITED Second Defendant MAYNE NICKLESS LIMITED Third Defendant YOUNGS TRANSPORT PTY. LIMITED Fourth Defendant
ANSETT TRANSPORT INDUSTRIES (OPERATIONS) PTY. LIMITED
Fifth Defendant EXPRESS FREIGHT PTY. LIMITED Sixth Defendant
ASSOCTATED STEAMSHIPS PTY.LTD.
Seventh Defendant IPEC HOLDINGS LIMITED Bighth Defendant
INTERSTATE PARCEL EXPRESS CO. PTY. LIMITED
Ninth Defendant
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
In this matter the Trade Practices Commission ("the
~2- plaintiff") seeks pecuniary penalties under ss. 76 and 77 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 ("the Act") and injunctions under s.80 of the Act against nine defendants. The
second defendant, Brambles Holdings Limited, ("Brambles"), is seeking to have certain paragraphs of the statement of claim struck out and is supported in this by a number of
other defendants.
Broadly the statement of claim alleges that, prior to the amendment of s.45 of the Act from 1 July 1977, the defendants, or certain of them, including Brambles, entered into three understandings and/or made three arrangements in breach of s.45(2)(a). It is alleged that the understandings were entered into and/or the arrangements made on 12 February 1976 (par. 21) 20 May 1976 (par.27) and 4 August 1976 (par. 33).
The statement of claim also alleges in pars. 26, 32 and 38 that Brambles gave effect to the arrangements and/or understandings alleged in pars. 21, 27 and 33 respectively and in par. 39 a continuation of this conduct
is alleged.
Brambles sought to have pars. 20(d), 24(2), 25(2), 26, 30(2), 31(2), 32, 36(2), 37(2), 38 and 39 struck out and relied mainly upon Order 20 rule 29 of the High Court Rules and argued that those paragraphs tended to prejudice, embarrass or delay the fair trial of the
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate