Federal Court of Australia
CATCHWORDS
Bankruptcy - Appeal against sequestration order - Applicetion to strike out appeal for want of prosecution -
Application to lift stay of sequestration order.
Federal Ccurt Rules 0.52; Bankruptcy Rules 12 and 195.
ERNST ABRANAM SIEWERTS2 VAN REESEMA v. FNMANOUIU Grate
No. G9 of 1979
Coram: Bowen C.J., Fisher and Lockhart JJ.
Sydney
20 December 1979.
IN THE FLDERAT. COURT OF AUSTRALIA )
DISTRICT REGTSTRY OF THE STATE OF NO. G 9 OF 1979 SOUTH AUSTRALLA |
GENERAL DIVISTON
ON APPEAL FROM
THE COURT OF INSOLVENCY
OF TOE STATE OF SOUTH AUSTRALTA
EXERCISING TPDERAL JURISDICTION
IN BANKRUPTCY
BANKRUPTCY DLSTRTICT OF
SOUTH AUSTRALIA
NO, 500 OF 1979 BETWEEN: ERNST ABR 'ILAM SLEVERTSZ VAN REESE ALS Appellant
AND: EMMANOULL GLAMEOS Respondent ORDER
JUDGES MAKING ORDER: BOWEN C.J., FISHER AND LOCKHART JJ.
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
DATE OF ORDER: THURSDAY, 20 DECEMBER 1979
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The stay of proceedings under the sequestration order made on 14 September 1979 be removed;
« Appeal No. G 9 of 1979 be dismissed for want of prosecution;
nh
and
3. That the respondent's costs of proceedings before this court in appeal No. G 9 of 1979, ancluding the costs of all applications heard by Fisher J. and the costs of the
proceedings before this Full Court, be paid by the appellazit.
-1-
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
DISTRICT REGISTRY OF THE STATE OF
SOUTH AUSTRALIA NO. G 9 OF 1979
ee ewe Se
GENERAL DIVISION
ON APPEAL FROM
THE COURT OF INSOLVENCY
OF THE STATE OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA
EXERCISING FEDERAL JURISDICTION
IN BANKRUPTCY
BANKRUPTCY DISTRICT OF
SOUTH AUSTRALIA
NO. 500 OF 1979 BETWEEN: ERNST ABRAHAM SIEWERTSZ VAN REESEMA APPELLANT AND: EMMANOUIL GIAMEOS RES PONDENT
CORAM: BOWEN C.J., FISHER AND LOCKHART JJ
SYDNEY
Thursday, 20 December 1979
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
This is an application for an order that the appeal
rE
~2- by Ernst Abraham Siewertsz Van Reesema ("the appellant") from a sequestration' order against his estate be dismissed for want of prosecution and for an order lifting a stay of proceedings under the sequestration order.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate