Federal Court of Australia
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION
2 January 1980
No. G 83 of 1979
et er er we
BETWEEN :
AUSTRALIAN BROADCASTING COMMISSION Applicant
AND ;:
ROBERT JAMES PARISH AND ORS BEING THE MEMBERS OF THE AUSTRALIAN CRICKET BOARD
First to Fourteenth Respondents
PBL MARKETING PTY LIMITED Fifteenth Resnondent WORLD SERIES CRICKET PTY LIMITED . Sixteenth Respondent
PUBLISHING AND BROADCASTING LIMITED
Seventeenth Respondent
ST.JOHN J.
By an application dated 21 December, 1979 the Australian
Broadcasting Commission sought, inter alia, interlocutory
relief against the respondents in respect to an agreement
entered into between the first fourteen respondents and the
three remaining respondents whom I shall refer to as the
personal respondents and the company respondents. That
agreement, originally entered into on 30 May, 1979 and
« - ./2
reaffirmed on 2] November, 1979, provided that the Australian
Cricket Board, an unincorporated association, of which the
personal respondents were members, granted to the company
respondents the exclusive right to televise international
cricket organised by that board. The rights are exclusive
in the sense that no other television station can be granted
such rights according to the terms of the agreement.
The applicant amended the orderg sought against the respondents.
They are as follows:-
That the first to fourteenth respondents be restrained
pending the determination of the proceedings or until
further order from engaging in the following conduct
namely:
(a)
(b)
giving effect to Clauses 1 and 2 of the contract, arrangement or understanding between the first to fourteenth respondents and the fifteenth to seventeenth respondents dated the 30th May, 1979 as amended by the contract, arrangement or understanding of the 21st November, 1979 for the purpose of or with the likely effect of preventing restricting or limiting the supply of services namely Television Rights to Cricket Test Matches by the first to fourteenth respondents;
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate