Federal Court of Australia
CATCHWORDS
Service out of the jurisdiction - one defendant out of
jurisdiction - whether shown to be joint tortfeasor with
defendants in jurisdiction.
Service out of the jurisdiction - setting aside writ - stay of proceedings - which is appropriate where case not within
s.11 of Service and Execution of Process Act 1901.
VICTORIAN BROADCASTING NETWORK LIMITED v. EDWARD GOUGH WHITLAM
F.C. No. 9 of 1979.
CORAM: Blackburn, Franki and Keely JJ. CANBERRA 2 April 1980.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY
F.C. No. 9 of 1979 DISTRICT REGISTRY
Nee Ned Na ad Nae Ne Se
GENERAL DIVISION
ON APPEAL from the Supreme Court of
the Australian Capital Territory
S.C. No. 482 of 1978
BCTWEEN: VICTORIAN BROADCASTING
NETWORK LIMITED Appellant (Fifthnamed Defendant)
AND: EDWARD GOUGH WHITLAM Respondent (Plaintiff)
ORDER
JUDGES MAKING ORDER: Blackburn, Franki and Keely JJ. DATE OF ORDER: 2 April 1980
WHERE MADE: Canberra
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The appellant have leave to apply within 21 days to amend its application by applying for a stay of proceedings.
2. The further hearing of the appeal be adjourned to a date to be fixed.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY DISTRICT REGISTRY
) ) No. F.C. 9 of 1979 ) ) )
GENERAL DIVISION
ON APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY S.C. No. 482 of 1978
BETWEEN: VICTORIAN BROADCASTING NETWORK LIMITED
Appellant (Fifthnamed Defendant)
AND: EDWARD GOUGH WHITLAM
Respondent (Plaintiff)
CORAM: BLACKBURN, FRANKI and KEELY JJ. 2 APRIL 1980
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
This 1s an appeal against an interlocutory decision of a judge of the Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory refusing to set aside a writ and the service of a writ. The respondent, Mr Whitlam, commenced proceedings in the Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory against fourteen defendants and the statement of claim was endorsed "The Plaintiff's Claim is For damages for libel for the publication of matter on the 5th December, 1977 contained in an interview with Mrs Leah Lynch within a programme known as 'Willesee at 7'". The appellant and the fifth defendant, the Victorian Broadcasting Network Limited, proceeded by way of notice of motion to have the writ of summons set aside in so far as it referred to the appellant and also to have the service
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate