Federal Court of Australia
Q "w
IN THE FEDERAL COURT
OF AUSTRALIA INDUSTRIAL DIVISION WESTERN AUSTRALIAN REGISTRY
BETWEEN:
AND:
WA No. 5 of 1980
IN THE MATTER of the Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904 Section 140 and 141
AND
IN THE MATTER of an application made pursuant to regulation 70 of the Conciliation and Arbitration Regulations for a Rule to Show Cause
RUTH MARGARET GENEFF
Applicant
F.E. PETERSON of 5 Corkery Crescent
Allambie Heights Sydney 2100 Respondent (1)
W.A. CLARINGBOLD of 32 Harrison Avenue, Burwood Melbourne 3125 Respondent (2)
P. WATKINS of 7 Timparra Place Sutherland Sydney 2932 Respondent (3)
G. PHILOPOULOS of 15 Elysium Crescent East Oakleigh Melbourne 3166 Respondent (4)
J. DREVER of 42 Spring Street Arnclifte Sydney 2205
Respondent (5)
L. FARRALLY of "Mountain Lodge" Molgoa Road Mulgoa Sydney 2750 Respondent (6)
B. WOOD of 38 Jessop Street Greensborough Melbourne 3088 Respondent (7)
J. STANTON of 10 Epping Close Kingswood Sydney 2750 Respondent (8)
-J. LEWIS of 18/138 Beach Road
Parkdale Melbourne 3194 Respondent (9)
P. McGARRY of 38 Barton Street Everton Park Queensland 4053 Respondent (10)
K. COLLINS of 1 Keith Crescent Marino South Australia 5049 Respondent (11)
THE CLOTHING AND ALLIED TRADE UNION
OF AUSTRALIA Room 28 A Trades Hall
Sydney NSW 2000 Respondent (12)
CORAM: TOOHEY J.
12 September 1980 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
On 29 July 1980 the applicant obtained a rule nisi
against the respondents pursuant to reg.70 of the Conciliation
and Arbitration Regulations. The proceedings are under ss.140
and 141 of the Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904.
The applicant acknowledges that some of the relief sought within the rule nisi is not within the power of this Court to grant and some does not truly reflect the matters of which she complains. She now seeks leave tc amend the terms of the rule nisi, partly to clarify the existing rule but also by way of addition, the applicant arguing that any additional matters fall within the scope of the affidavit sworn by her in support of her application.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate