Chanel Ltd & Anor v Raymond John Peter Mellick [1981] FCA 259
Federal Court of Australia
Full text
Select any passage to save a personal note with optional tags.
IN THE FEDDCRAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V.G. No. 199 of 1981
GENERAL DIVISION
BETWEEN:
CHANEL LIMITED and
CHANEL (AUSTRALIA) PTY. LTD. Applicants
and
RAYMOND JOIN PETER MULLICK Respondent
NORTHROP J. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 18 DECEMBER 1981
I propose to make the interlocutory injunctions as
sought by the applicants. I am satisfied that in regard to
the provisions of the Trade Practices Act 1974 and the facts
established in this case, the Court has jurisdiction to make
the orders against Raymond John Peter Mellick, a person not
being a corporation, based upon trade or commerce among the
States and also the use of postal services, and referring in
particular to s.6(1) and (2)(a)(ii) and (iii) of the Act.
On the material before the Court, I am satisfied in
the requisite sense that the respondent, Mellick, has been
advertising and, by use of brochures, engaging in trade or
commerce among the States, and also by post, in relation Lo
tas
perfumes in such a way as to be in breach of ss.52, 53A and
55 of the Trade Practices Act, particularly in regard to the
reference to Chanel 5, Chanel 19, and any other perfume of
the applicant, and that the use of the expressions in the
advertisement and the pamphlets or brochures is in breach of
those.
The replica of those perfumes and the substitution
in fragrance for those perfumes, constitute conduct contrary
to the provisions of the sections of the Act to which I have
referred.
Accordingly, the Court orders that untsl] the
heating and determination of this application the respondent,
Raymond John Peter Mellick, whether by himself or by his
servant or agent or otherwise, directly or indirectly, be
restrained -
(a) from falsely representing, whether expressly or by
implication, that the perfumes offerred for sale by
the respondent are identical to or virtually
identical to the applicant's perfumes or any of
them;
(b) from falsely representing, whether expressly or by
implication, that the perfumes offered for sale by
the respondent are substitutes or virtual
(c)
{d)
(e)
(£)
substitutes in fragrance for the epplicant's
perfumes or any of them;
from falsely representing, whether expressly or by
implication, that the perfumes or any of them
offered for sale by the respondents are a replica
or a virtual replica of the applicant's perfumes of
any of them;
from falsely representing, whether expressly or by
implication, that the perfumes or any of them
offered for sale by the respondent are
indistinguishable or virtually indistinguisheble
from the applicant's perfumes or any of them;
from falsely representing, whether expressly or by
implication, that the perfumes or any of them
offered for sale by the respondent are the
applicant's perfumes or any of them;
from falsely representing, whether expressly or by
implication, that the perfumes or any of them
offered for sale by the respondent are of the same
or virtually the same standard, quality, grade
and/or composition as the applicant's perfumes or
any of them;
perme meen? errata Riek rceteen sd Mamata SEE Neate ee daNSevemrnatie eesti ane omataet Melina eaten mt tet mes mete Lat eRe ne a RLM atta, A KR Seana hate meneame N we Ramee ma
Neb
(g) from engaging in conduct that is Jivble to mislead
the public as to the nature, the manufacturing
process or the characteristics of the perfurcs or
any of them offered for sale by the respondents,
and each of those conducts constituting breaches of
the Trade Practices Act 1974 or being contrary to
the provisions of that Act.
I do not propose to make any order for costs apart
from reserving the costs. I have heard what Mr. Robson has
said, these are interlocutory proceedings and the normal
procedure is that costs be costs jn the cause or reserved.
It seems to me, despite what has been said, it is appropriate
that costs should be costs in the cause in this matter.
etm ae So ee DU Ree
1 certify that this and the theae (3)
pieceding pages are a true copy of the
Reasons for Judgment Leiem of the
Honourable Mr. Justice wo thre
, a,
Ath sedente
Associate
g
{
> .
. j Deted: UY DEctaper J9S1
&
SAL STA ee.
re ter TI et
ete Stee ewer eer ee tree re ee eee ee ee - -
Related laws
No related documents linked yet.
You've got 21 of 22 free Acts left this visit. Sign up anytime for Facts, Related, and study briefs too.