Federal Court of Australia
JUDGIWENT iu. ec caeel
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
GENERAL DIVISION
BANKRUPTCY DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF
NEW SOUTH WALES AND THE
AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY
RE:
EX PARTE:
ORDER
JUDGE MAKING ORDER:
WHERE MADE: DATE OF ORDER:
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
The application be dismissed
PR? BT
No. 586 of 1978
JAMES HUNTER
ACMIL INDUSTRIES PTY. LIMITED formerly F. & T. BUILDING PRODUCTS PTY. LIMITED (wrongly called F. & T. BUILDING PRODUCTS LIMITED trading as PGH CERMATICS
LOCKHART J.
AT SYDNEY
FRIDAY 1 MAY 1981
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
GENERAL DIVISION
BANKRUPTCY DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF No. 586 of 1978
NEW SOUTH WALES AND THE
AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY
RE: JAMES HUNTER
EX PARTE: ACMIL INDUSTRIES PTY. LIMITED formerly F. & T. BUILDING PRODUCTS PTY. LIMITED (wrongly called F. & T. BUILDING PRODTICT,
LIMITED trading as PGH CERAyy-S
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
LOCKHART J.
1 May 1981
AT SYDNEY
This is an application to review the decision of a Deputy Registrar in Bankruptcy disallowing certain items on the taxation of a bill of costs, all being claims for the "travelling time" of the solicitor for the petitioning creditor between Miranda, where he has his office, and this Court or its Registry
The same questions are involved in this appeal as arose in the
application for review in the matter of Dacey in respect of which
I have just given judgment. The result is the same, namely that the application fails.
The Court orders that the application be dismissed.
£ a
bee et
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate