(1S IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA WA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION No. G. 250 of 1982 THOMAS ERVIN MOSS Applicant and BRUCE RAYMOND BROWN First Respondent amd PDTER LAMB Second Respondent ORDERS JUDGE MAKING ORDERS: ST, JOHN, J. 5 DATEL OF ORDERS: THURSDAY 6 JANUARY 1983 WHERE MADE: AT SYDNEY THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The applicant file any additional facts or documentary evidence relied upon in support of the application within twenty-one (21) days of this date. 20/2 The application for review be fixed for hearing in early February 1983 by consul-~ tation with the registrar. No order as to costs. IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GLNERAL DIVISION No. G. 250 of 1982 THOMAS ERVIN MOSS Applicant and BRUCL RAYMOND BROW? First Respondent Second Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGIIENT (EXTEMPORE) ST. JOHN, J. THURSDAY 6 JANUARY 1983 AT SYDNEY . This is an application by the respondent Peter Lamb for expedition of an application by Thomas Exvin Moss to review a decision of Ilis Worship Bruce Raymond Brown (the first respondent) made at the end of committal proceedings in which «6/2 the applicant was charged with conspiracy and against whom a prima facie case was found. To the application the second respondent has filed an objection to the competency of this court alleging that there is no Jurisdiction in the court to review the decision of the first respondent, and it is put to me that the matter should be urgently dealt with during the vacation on the basis that it 1s in the public interest that it be decided. The present position of the compeittal proceedings is that on 18 January next the magistrate will seek from the applicant an indication as to whether or not he proposes to call evidence and if ~ he does so propose to call evidence, that evidence will be heard in March of this year. The decision in respect of which the application for review has been made is the decision that a prima facie case has been made out. In those circumstances I see no grounds for treating this matter as urgent. TT | L cortify that this and the owe (1) preceding puges are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment heroin of his Honour ur. Justice GT Tous Assoczate Dated i (1-1-3 |