Federal Court of Australia
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
AUSTRALIAN CAPTTAL TERRITORY
DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISTON
ON APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY
BETWEEN: JANET DILYSE HUGHES Applicant AND: THE QUEEN Respondent ORDER JUDGE MAKING ORDER: Neaves J. DATE OF ORDER: 14 April, 1983 WHERE MADE: Canberra
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. That the application be dismissed.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY
No. A.C.T. G11 of 1983 DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION
ON APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY
BETWEEN: JANET DILYSE HUGHES Applicant AND: THE QUEEN Respondent CORAM: Neaves J.
14 April, 1983
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
This is an application for bail pending the hearing of an appeal by the applicant, Janet Dilyse Hughes, against her conviction and sentence in the Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory on a charge under sub-section 4(3) of the Poisons and Narcotics Drugs Ordinance 1978 of the Territory that she had a controlled substance in her possession for the purpose of supplying the substance to another person
or to other persons.
The controlled substance was cannabis (see the Ordinance, sub-section 4(1) and Schedule 12). The charge arose from the discovery at premises known as 77 Piddington Street, Watson, which were owned by the applicant, more than 400 growing cannabis plants and
a quantity of dried material derived from those plants.
The applicant and a male person who was tried with her were convicted on 11 February, 1983. The learned trial Judge entertained an application by the applicant for bail pending sentence. Bail was granted to the appli- cant on her own recognizance of $1,000 on strict reporting conditions. Sentence was awarded on 3 March, 1983, the applicant being sentenced to imprisonment for one year
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate