Federal Court of Australia
| ly. S Ax THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA )
Peal
a
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION
JUDGE MAKING ORDER: DATE OF ORDER: WHERE MADE:
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
BETWEEN :
is
Franki J.
) No. G.44 of 1978
)
T.N.T. MANAGEMENT PTY. LIMITED, ANSETT TRANSPORT INDUSTRIES (OPERATIONS } PTY. LIMITED and ASSOCIATED STEAMSHIPS PTY. LIMITED
Applicants
TRADE PRACTICES COMMISSION
Respondent
20 June 1983
Sydney
No order 1s made upon the application other than that the
respondent, Trade Practices Commission, pay'three quarters of
the costs of the applicants, T.N.T. Management Pty. Limited,
Ansett Transport Industries (Operations) Pty. Limited and
Associated Steamships Pty. Limited in this motion.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA )
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY ) No. G.44 of 1978
GENERAL DIVISION )
BETWEEN: T.N.T. MANAGEMENT PTY. LIMITED, ANSETT TRANSPORT INDUSTRIES (OPERATIONS ) PTY. LIMITED and ASSOCIATED STEAMSHIPS
PTY. LIMITE
Applicants - AND: TRADE PRACTICES COMMISSION Respondent
20 June 1983
Sydney
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
FRANKI J. I give judgment in this epplication, in which I reserved judyment, but I have not been able to get the judgment into a
form which can be given to the parties, particularly because of
the position of this later affidavit of Miss Hannon, which I allowed to be read in court this morning. I will have to read what I have got to say. I am giving it orally because of what
was perhaps until the last few minutes the urgency of the matter.
Before me is an application filed on 23 May 1983 by
T.N.T. Management Pty. Limited, Ansett Transport Industries (Operations) Pty. Limited and Associated Steamships Pty. Limited ("the applicants"), who are the first, fifth and seventh
defendants, in an action brought by the Trade Practices
Commission under the Trade Practices Act 1974.
The action was commenced in May 1978 and there have been approximately 25 judgments on interlocutory matters, four of which have been given in appeals to the Full Court of this Court and one by the High Court which had granted special leave to
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate