Select any passage to save a personal note with optional tags.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
GENERAL DIVISION
BANKRUPTCY DISTRICT THE STATE OF
NEW SOUTH WALES AND THE AUSTRALIAN
we we ww wwe Ss Sw
CAPITAL TERRITORY No.W655 of 1981
RE: IvVoOR LEISER
ORDER
+
Judge making order: Beaumont, J.
Date of order: 20 September, 1983.
Where made: Sydney.
° 2
THE COURT ORDERS:
1. I order that the application for discharge be
2. I make no order as to costs.
eee te ary sR A HERR A NE NR RE ENR ee ee mR ee ee eta
w
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
GENERAL DIVISION
NEW SOUTH WALES AND THE AUSTRALTAN
)
)
)
)
BANKRUPTCY DISTRICT THE STATE OF )
)
)
)
)
CAPITAL TERRITORY NoW655 of 1981
RE: Ivor LEISER
CORAM: Beaumont, J.
DATED: 20 September, 1983.
(ex tempore)
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
In this matter I have already indicated that I
propose to refuse the application. I will now give reasons.
This is an application for discharge from bankruptcy.
The facts are that the bankrupt was made bankrupt by a
sequestration order dated 27 July, 1981. No assets were
brought to the credit of the estate and the bankrupt has made
no contributions on that account.
A number of creditors, some external, but in one case
the former wife of the bankrupt, have proved in the estate. In
round figures the amounts of the debts in which proof has been
made exceed some $65,000 of which some $16,000 consists of
a debt owed to the former wife of the bankrupt pursuant to a
deed of settlement executed when their marriage broke up.
Originally some $29,000 was owed by the bankrupt to his wife
on that account, but various payments were made in reduction
and the debt now stands in the sum of approximately $16,000
which was the subject of a judgment obtained in the District
Court.
In paragraphs 8 and 9 of the report of the Official
Receiver dated 30 August, 1983 there is set out in a form
which £ would adopt for this purpose information as to the
bankrupt's present financial and personal position. There is
also in that part of the report some explication of -he way in
which the bankrupt became financially embarrassed, principally
by reason of his activities as a director and shareholder of a
private company, Rosewear Pty. Limited. I will not repeat
that material here but would seek, as it were, to incorporate
it by reference.
The bankrupt has sworn an affidavit today which has
been read in the application in which he indicates his current
position. He says that he 1s presently residing with his wife,
Ruth Leiser, but that he has suffered some health problems to
the extent that he is receiving medical treatment for ulcers.
In paragraph 8 of that affidavit he says that, 1f he 1s now
discharged, it is not his intention to enter into any business
on his own behalf, rather it is more his wish to continue as
he is at present but without the stigma of bankruptcy. He refers
to the circumstance that he has four children aged 23 years,
25 years and twins, 28 years of age and some grandchildren.
Reference was also made during the course of the hearing to the
circumstance that one of his children is to be married shortly
and the bankrupt wishes, perhaps understandably, in his later
years to be free from the stigma that is attached through
bankruptcy.
In my opinion this application is premature. There
are, in my view, no special circumstances which would suggest
that the statutory period of three years should not run its
full course in the present case.
I may say that 1f there had been no external creditors
or if some assets had been brought in for the benefit of
creditors or if some contributions had been made, however modest,
my attitude may well have been different but as matters stand
there are no assets, there are no contributions, there are
significant external creditors, and the application is made
barely two years after the date of the sequestration order.
In those circumstances I propose to refuse the applic-
ation and the orders I make are as follows:
l. I refuse the application for discharge.
2. I make no order as to costs.
3. I order that the exhibits may be handed out.
| certify that ttmassad the 3S preceding
pages are a true copy of the reasons for
judgment herein of Tne Honourable
Mr Justice Beaumont. D Cyr
Associate
Dated [7 ocho 1433
et Paaet ON UIE ean ETA mo nea
Related laws
No related documents linked yet.
You've got 21 of 22 free Acts left this visit. Sign up anytime for Facts, Related, and study briefs too.