CATCHWORDS Practice and procedure - Jurisdiction of Federal Court to deal with non-federal claim against second respondent - Industrial law - Applicant offered employment by second respondent subject to his achieving clearance or membership of the first respondent - Declaration sought under s.144 that applicant entitled to be enrolled as member of the first respondent - Application to join second respondent as party to proceedings - Declaration sought against second respondent that applicant employed within meaning of s.144 - Order sought to restrain second respondent from terminating employment - Question of employment of applic- ant by second respondent central part of controversy between applicant and first' respondent - Accrued jurisdiction of Federal Court considered - Formula of "common transactions and facts" applied. Conciliation and Arbitration Act, 1904-1983 ss.144(1), 144(3), 144(5), 144(5A), 144(6) and 144(7) PAUL TURNER" _ v. THE AUSTRALASIAN COAL AND SHALE EMPLOYEES FEDERATION and ELCOM COLLERIES PTY. LIMITED No. 24 of 1983 Beaumont, J. Sydney 31 October, 1983. IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES REGISTRY INDUSTRIAL DIVISION No. 24 of 1983 IN THE MATTER OF THE CONCILIATION & ARBITRATION ACT, 1904-1983 BETWEEN : PAUL TURNER Applicant AND: THE AUSTRALASIAN COAL AND SHALE EMPLOYEES FEDERATION First respondent fine = AND: ELCOM COLLIERIES PTY. LIMITED Second respondent ORDER Judge making order: Beaumont, J. Date order made: 31 October, 1983. Where made: Sydney. . THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. Application of the second respondent to be dismissed from these proceedings is refused. 2. Costs reserved. 3. Fix Monday, 7 November, 1983 at 2.15 p.m. fora further directions hearing. IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES REGISTRY INDUSTRIAL DIVISION No. 24 of 1983 IN THE MATTER OF THE CONCILIATION & ARBITRATION ACT, 1904-1983 BETWEEN : PAUL TURNER Applicant AND THE AUSTRALASTAN COAL AND SHALE EMPLOYEES FEDERATION Pirst respondent ~ AND: ELCOM COLLIERIES PTY. LIMITED Second respondent CORAM: Beaumont, J. DATED: 31 October, 1983. ~ REASONS FOR JUDGMENT This matter was heard with matter No. 14 of 1983. For the reasons given in that matter, I would refuse the application of the second respondent to be dismissed from the proceedings. I will reserve costs at this stage. I fix Monday, 7 November, 1983 at 2.15 p.m. for a further directions hearing in the matter. | certify that ee! the preceding pages em a true copy of the reasons for judgment herein of The Honourable Mr Justice Beaumont. S Dione ees te Dated 31 octelw 1933