Federal Court of Australia
mete te pe EAD
'
stu
em ee ee ee
ceed tal hp len yelp tame tery inten ee poe 7 .
ea ee ret re eet ete Reem net ded tte en eee ne at tt ta me Me en
t)
C8)
wv
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA )
-* ) - VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY ) No. VG 183 of 1982 VICTORIA DisTRr es evrsi ss * )
)
GENERAL DIVISION
BETWEEN : TRIMKNIT MANUFACTURING PTY. LTD. AND : HARVEY BATES 22 December 1983 KEELY J. . ~ - REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
This is an application under s. 5 of the Administrative
Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (the Judicial Review Act)
for an order of review in respect of a decision made by the
respondent as delegate of the Minister of Business and Consumer
Affairs.
The application dated 7 December, 1982 described the
"decision" in the following terms :-
"Application to review the decision of the Respondent made on 17 December, 1981 pursuant to the provisions of Section 273 of the Customs Act 1901, that the Applicant's tariff quotas for the seven year period commencing 1 January, 1981 be as
follows :
j | | | |
w. oe (a) 71132 units in respect of knitted coats, jumpers, cardigans, sweaters and the like:
tube tops, (b) $982,999-00 in respect of knitted coats,
jumpers, cardigans, sweaters and the like:
tube tops."
(The reference above to "1 January 1981" should
be to 1982)
Paragraph (a) referred to a decision relating to complete garments; paragraph (b) referred to a decision relating co "parts for" garments. Mr. Ostrowski, of Queens Counsel, who appeared with Mr. Hansen for the applicant, stated in final address that the decision sought to be reviewed was 'that relating to full garments, not the one relating to parts. The application seeks to have that decision quashed or set aside and an""order referring the Applicant's application for tariff quota
to the respondent for further consideration".
Before passing to the substantive questions involved in this application it is desirable to refer to the relevant aspects of the applicant's business in the period prior to December 1981 and the events leading up to the bringing of this
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate