Sent, Edward Christiaan & Anor v Jet Corporation of Australia Petres Pty Ltd & Ors v Jet Corporation of Australia Collier & Anor v Jet Corporation of Australia [1984] FCA 185

Qa oe eee

wot tee

~~

CATCHHORDS

Stacemenk of Claim - whether a cause of actia eflewents constituting involvement within the meaning of s.7TR of the Trade Practices Act 1974 - whether those elements were diecliosed by pleadings aqainst certain appellants - meaning of ""eausing" a representation to be made or an agreement to be enrered into ox completed - whether the cespondent comeany

conid be misled when the mind of the compeny was the wind of

wD

directors alleged to ha involved in the misleadine and deceptive conduct, Serurity for casts - whether the Federal Court had

jurisd ?ckion te exercise the discretion contained in 5.533

Companies Act 1981 (Vic.}) - Factors taken into account

veyaht to be attributed te certain factors - the issue of the

0D

respondent company suing for benefit of another within the context of both 0.28 £.3(1)(6) and 5.5323 of the Companies Act 1981 (Vaic.).

Appeal - principles to be applied in an appeal from an exercise of a discretion by the primary qudjqge ona matter ot

practice and procedure,

Trade Practices Act 1974 - ss.52, 75B.

Companies Act 1981 (Vie.) - 5.533

Federal Court Pules - 0.28 r.3(1)1b)

seer meres comers were a Qe ca ee: ate oe was e Petar - 5

a re ee ee meee - ea

EDWARD CHRISTIAAN SENT & ANOR v. JET CORPORATION OF AUSTPALIA

PTY. LTD. (VG NO. 226 OF 1983)

PETFES FY. LTD. & ORS. v. JET CORPOPATION OF AUSTRALTA PTY,

' LID. (VG NO. 227 OF 1983)

JOHN BARRY COLLIER & ANOR v. JET CORPORATION OF AUSTRALIA PTY.

LTD. (VG NO. 236 OF 1983)

Smithers, Sweenev & McGregor JJ.

Melbourne.

ae rare See

eee

te eed an ohne net athe hae Ri ou no niteltee aturre citemehe nar