Federal Court of Australia
Repatriation - wor widows Pension - summons to applicant to
attena hearing oy kepacriation keview Tribunal - obiection by applicant's representative - request to have questions referred to
Federal Court cefused - writ of mandamus - question of
construction - meaning of "mav" - discretion vested in Tribunal
with concurrence of President - writ of mandamus inappropriate
Repatriation Act 1920 ss. 31, 107VU, 107VY, 107VZZB, 107VZZG, 107VZZH Judiciary Act 1903 s.39B
Broadcasting and Television Act 1942 s.22B Copyright Act 1968 s.161 Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 s.45
Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (N.S.W.) s.5B
APPLICATION for a Writ of Mandamus against Roland Patrick Hassell, Deputy President, Desmond Matthew Tehan, Services Member and Stanley McLeish Harris, Member. a Repatriation Review Tribunal
Ex Parte: ELYS FRANCES NORMAN (Prosecutor)
Commonwealth of Australia (Third Party)
No. WA G23 of 1984
TOOHEY J. PERTH 4 JULY 1984
iN THE FEDERAL CuiiPT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION
No. WA G23 of 1984
~~~-~- -
APPLICATION for a Writ of Mandamus against Roland Patrick Hassell, Deputy President. Desmond Matthew Tehan, Services Member and Stanley McLeish Harris. Member. a Repatriation Review Tribunal Ex Parte ELYS FRANCES NORMAN
Prosecutor
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Third Party
CORAM: TOOHEY J. 4 JULY 1984
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
This is an application for a writ of mandamus against
the members of the Repatriation Review Tribunal established by the
Repatriation Act 1920.
IT have just delivered reasons for judgment ina similar application made by Mrs. Pride aqainst the same members of the Tribunal. The present application was heard immediately
thereafter. Because the issues involved were identical, counsel
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate