Federal Court of Australia
CATCHWORDS
Administrative Law - judicial review - applicant withdrew objections to tax assessments for the years ending 30 June 1975 and 30 June 1976 in February 1980 - in October 1983 applicant sought to proceed with the objections - respondent advised applicant by letter in February 1984 that the objections had been withdrawn - whether respondent had made a
"decision" within the meaning of the ADJR Act.
Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977: s3s.3;
5S:
Income Tax Assessment Act: s.186
Robert Edward Higgs v The Commissioner of Taxation G182 of Sweeney, J. 17 September, 1984
Sydney.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY No. G182 of 1984
wewvurnw
GENERAL DIVISION
BETWEEN: ROBERT EDWARD HIGGS Applicant AND THE COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION Respondent
Judge Making Order: Sweeney, J. Date: 17 September, 1984
Where Made: Sydney
ORDER
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. the objection to competency of the application be
upheld, with costs.
2. the application be dismissed, with costs.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY No. G182 of 1984
GENERAL DIVISION
BETWEEN: ROBERT EDWARD HIGGS Applicant AND THE COMMISSIONER OF TAXATI.4 Respondent
Reasons for Judgment
Sweeney, J. Sydney, 17 September, 1984
By application dated 7 June 1984 Robert Edward Higgs (the applicant) sought a review under the Administrative Decisions
(Judicial Review) Act 1977 (the Act) of what he described as the decision of the Commissioner of Taxation (the respondent) "that objection lodged by the applicant against income tax assessments
for the years ended 30 June 1975 and 1976 have been withdrawn."
The application read as follows:-
"Application to review the decision of the Respondent that objection lodged by the Applicant against income tax assessments for the years ended 30 June, 1975 and 1976 have been withdrawn.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate