Honora Mary Pride v Ronald Patrick Hassell & ors [1984] FCA 452

CATCHWORDS

Practice and Procedure - Costs - Appeal discontinued -—-

Legislation resolving question against appellant - Legislation

enacted after filing of Notice of Appeal - Each party to pay own

costs.

Repatriation Leqislation Amendment Act 1984.

HONORA MARY PRIDE v ROLAND PATRICK HASSELL, DESMOND MATTHEW TEHAN

and STANLEY McLEISH HARRIS

W.A. G74 of 1984

CORAM: Bowen C.J., Northrop and Morling JJ. 11 December 1984

Perth

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA )

) WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY) W.A. No. G 74 of 1984

) GENERAL DIVISION )

ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

BETWEEN :

HONORA MARY PRIDE Aprellant

and

ROLAND PATRICK HASSELL, DESMOND MATTHEW TERAN

and STANLEY McLEISH HARRIS,

a Repatriation Review Tribunal First kespondents and THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Second Respondent

COURT: Bowen CJ, Northrop and Morling JJ.

DATE: 11 December 1984

PLACE: Perth

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1. The appellant be given leave to discontinue the appeal.

2. Each party pay his own costs of the appeal.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA ) ) WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY) W.A. No. G 74 of 1984

) GENERAL DIVISION )

ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

BETWEEN :

HONORA MARY PRIDE Apreiiant

and

ROLAND PATRICK HASSELL,

DESMOND MATTHEW TEHAN and STANLEY McLEISH HARRIS,

a Repatriation Review Tribunal First Respondents and THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Second Respondent