CaTCHBORAS TRAE FRACTICES - Trade Practices Act 1974 - Consumer protection —- Comprehensive motor vehicle insurance - Newspaper advertisement - Television advertisement —- Comparative advertising - Misleading or deceptive comduct - Application for interlocutory relief granted. Trage Prackices Act 1974 55.52 and 33 SELURITY & GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED. ¥ IM THSUPANCE PTL. LTD, SA NeowGl? of 1904 Adelaide G1 May 1984. Trt YUE FEUERAL LOURLT UF AUSTRALIA, } No.G1l?7 of 1964 SGQUTH HUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTR3 ? GENERAL WIVISIGON } BETWEEN: ELURTTY & GENERAL ([NSURANCE hrAKwY LIMITED Applicant - and = Jm iNSURAWCE PTY. LYG. Re¢gpandeant ok DER JULGE MAKING OGROER : Fisher i. WHERE ADL : Adelaide TAYE : 1l May 1964 UPON the vseplicant by ats counsel undertaking to abide by any order the Court may make as to damages ain case tne Court enoulid nareinafter oe of Opinian tnat the respondent shall have sustained any ty reason of ihis order which the applicant ought toa pay. THE COURT OFDCRs: l. That the respondent oe restrained amd an injgumctian is hereby granted rescrsyining the respondent, 1ts servants or agents until trial of whie xetion or further order Or agents until trisl of this action or furlher order from publishing or causing to be published whether by the medium of television, radio, newspapers, BPerzodicals. posters, brochures, pamphlets or atnerwise any stalement purporcing Lo give 3 comparison af the cosk of molor vehicle comprehensive insurance available through the applicant and the respondent which 1s ain the following form, namely "1961 Ealeon, Commodore or Sigma 123 wonths comprehensive insurance Lumleys $155.76 S.G.7.C. $141.03 iM $ 99.99 an ¢ 9a ,9% Saving kOSS.77 Saving # 41,04 ° . or ain a idite form which fails to state securastely the nature and cost of the insurance cover offered by each of them and any sagnificant differences in the policies Providing such cover avallsble through the applicant and the respondent. \ Thst there be laberty te either party +o apply to vary or discharge thas order on 4 gays' motice to the other That the question af costs be reserved. an HE ERUEWAL COuder UF SOUTH 4USTRALIA HWISTRICL GEWEFAL DIV1LSINtk JUUGE mar 1NG OFRer WHEEE mate TAIL THE COUFL wROEPS THAT: AlsThaLins FEGISTR. ) } BE TW E EW: SECUPITY & WENEPAL INSLRANLE Cohyrast Liniten Arpliceant ~ ound - afi hoo F tne {nSuhaneik PIY. Lit. Respondent riene: J. Ade] side Sl May 1964 matter run trom this dav, IN THE TENERAL COUrT QE AUSTRALTA) } Na.Gj7 oi 1loke EGUTH AUSTIALT/ DISTRICT REGISTRY) } NENENe L OB CVUTISTON , SECURITY & Este AL IN sulLeeCk ChnpaAbY Li iTthy Son lrveune ~ and - im (MasPANCE Fur. TL. Re. pondent FEISHER 3.: Thies matter wee heard concurrently with thet of State Government Insurance Cammissiom v Iti Lnsuran a ot qd ' ' to . ul fa Judgment was also entered an il fay 21984 oan 342 application tor smterilacutery relied, Tne tuii regsone for my tecasien on twist Gev are ret audi oan the restons for Juagment oeli-ered thie ase on tone Stare bavernoment Tnsur ance Lomi sstvon mecter Baw weaieh there RE MO prolit to repeat. J] also order thet ite tame for yppear in a I certify that this and the preceding pages are a true copy of ihe Reasons for Judgment of Mr. Justice Fisher. ee ee otis — Dated. . ~< Associate