Federal Court of Australia
Industrial law
access to employees -
CATCHWORDS
~ award breach - authorised person
whether authorised person was
to conduct legitimate union business
Conciliation & Arbitration Act 1904 ~ 5. 119
Clothing Trades Award 1982 ~- clause 29(b)
refused
seeking
THE CLOTHING AND ALLIED TRADES UNION OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA v
TAYLOR CLOTHING MANUFACTURING COMPANY PTY. LIMITED
CORAM DATE PLACE
KEELY J. 12 JUNE,
ADELAIDE
IN_THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA ) ) SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY ) S.A. No. 9 of 1985
) INDUSTRIAL DIVISTON )
BETWEEN:
THE CLOTHING AND ALLTED TRADES UNION OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA
(Applicant) AND: TAYLOR CLOTHING
MANUFACTURING COMPANY PTY LIMITED
(Respondent )
12 JUNE 1985 KEELY J.
REVISED ORAL JUDGMENT
This is an application under s.119 of the Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904 (the Act) for the imposition of a penalty upon the respondent for an alleged breach of clause 29(b) of the Clothing Trades Award 1982 (the award). It alleged that on 24 April 1985 the respondent farled to comply with clause 29(b) :-
"in refusing permission to John Stanton a person duly authorised in writing to reasonable ingress into the factory and access to the employees during the midday meal to conduct legitimate union business."
The wording of the alleged breach is somewhat odd. It was
criticised by the respondent, but I accept Mr Hayes'
submissions, on behalf of the applicant, as to the proper
construction of clause 29(b).
On the evidence and the agreed facts I find that at all material times:
1. The respondent was a company incorporated in the State of South Australia.
2. The applicant, the Clothing and Allied Trades Union of Australia (the union), was an organisation of employees, registered under the Act, and was affected by the alleged breach.
3. The award was binding on the respondent which conducted a business of manufacturing fashion garments at a factory (the factory) at 436 Dunorlan Road, Edwardstown, South Australia. Members of the union were employed at the factory, their employment being governed by the terms of the award.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate