Lubidineuse, G.D. & Ors Bevanere Pty Ltd [1985] FCA 327

teeenatinanineineetahm ten, Monat Gh een seen ahicaie nate ln Ae ent tee taeee Seen afl me Rim Sh me Bt inten mbm neem tan

I HQ iQ pa io) ay ty tw?

TRADE PRACTICES - Misleading or deceptive cenduct -

ale of beauty clinic - Clinic operated at

22 damages -

ta

by curchasers - Claim for recovery of both purchasas pri tradaung losses - Apportionment of ctctal outlays becween loss

cecasioned by the conéuct sf the r

oO we TS

ondert and ciher -sxuses Teade Practices Act 1374 $35.52,32,97

Brown v Jam Factory Pty Lim Pity Mutual Life so )

101. Gould v V

ne [ou I 'ye leon

1D} p> yw +

wher OD on wm i

N.5.N. No. G.89 of 1324 GAETAN DIINO LUBIDINEUSE & ORS v BEVANERE PTY DilTTep

a a ne oe

cen> oe eet

See etna an tener tne ntact AA REA Ltt Sat Mn thn ene ne tant ten enn te Payer hts ne Aleta feet ea fa ete we ce

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF

NEW EAUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY '

GEN

ERAL DIVISION

TUE

BETWEEN ;

GAETAN DIINO LUPTLINEVSS Fisse Apelicant SVZETTE MAGRICETTE LUBICINEVEE Secend Applicansz

wuisd Agslisanc BRiUIeTe MAPGARRTTE CESAVE Fourth Applocans

MINUTE OF ORDERS

COURT ORDERS THAT:

tasers

nts advainst the res thousand l3sliars |

Ree em an . Bice iin in faveuw .2 Rodent in the gun wf S35 ,0903

alan

ee ek ~ ee -

respondent to che applicants af the business: know: as Deidce Prussak Cosmetiz Clinics be varisi Dy yedcuciad the agreed purchase price from forty tacusan? dollacs

aes

($46,000) to cthiyty-fave thousand dcllare ($35, 220}

aQ Ga ro] oo mo a ct Tv io" G cr g < iDfh en cr ct So D fu we] ae) ny BK 7) huwt Le PY) an is] is] =] A.3 cr [T vw a Ov] ca mh ity kK zi La) ct om om so tr L a [on on

ks

. Within twentr-sne +21} days of this ceaec, the cespondent discharge and deliver up to the aprelicants or to their solicitors all securlcy documents Leld by them in relation ta the payment oF the cr le gum of five thousand dellars (35,000).