Federal Court of Australia
CATCHWORDS
Bankruptcy - Application for extension of bankruptcy notice - Section 41(7) - Insufficiency of affidavit - Occurrence of an act
of bankruptcy.
Bankruptcy Act 1966, s.40(1)(9g), s.41(6A), 5.41(7). " 2,
RE: ROBERT JOHN LAYBUTT AND IRENA LAYBUTT
EX PARTE: GEORGE ROBINSON AND PATRICIA LOUISE ROBINSON
No. B 2152 of 1985
Burchett J. 17 July 1985
Sydney
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
) ) BANKRUPTCY DISTRICT OF NEW SOUTH WALES ) No. B 2152 of 1985 } )
AND THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY
RE: ROBERT JOHN LAYBUTT and IRENE LAYBUTT EX PARTE:
GEORGE ROBINSON and PATRICIA LOUISE ROBINSON
MINUTE OF ORDER
Judge Making Order: Burchett J.
Date Order made: 17 July 1985
Where made: Sydney
THE COURT ORDERED THAT:
1)
2)
The application for further extension of time to comply with the bankruptcy notice was refused.
An order was made providing for the costs of the creditor in the alternative events of a petition based upon non-compliance with the bankruptcy notice leading to a
sequestration order within six months, and this not occurring.
NOTE: settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36
of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALTA } )
BANKRUPTCY DISTRICT OF NEW SOUTH WALES ) No. B 2152 of 1985 } )
AND THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY
RB: ROBERT JOHN LAYBUIT and TRENA LAYBUTT EX PARTE: GEORGE ROBINSON
and PATRICIA LOUISE ROBINSON
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT
BURCHETT J.
As the matter is urgent, I will give my decision now. This is an application to extend time for compliance with a bankruptcy notice, pending appeal against a judgment of Beaumont J. determining that he was not satisfied, pursuant to s. 40(1)(g) and s.41(7) of the Bankruptcy Act, that the debtors had a counter
claim, set off, or cross demand falling within s. 40(1)(q).
Beaumont J. treated the matter as an application to set aside the notice, and granted a 14 day extension to enable the debtors to consider their position. This extension I continued by consent for a further week until today. Beaumont J., in his reasons, doubted the sufficiency of the affidavit, which had been
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate