Federal Court of Australia
Woe CATCHWORDS Post and Telecommunications - validity of warrants issued
pursuant to the Telecommunications Interception Act 1979 -
prescribed form of warrant contained in regulations made pursuant to the Telecommunications Interception Act 1979 - whether failure of warrant to nominate any particular person or persons to execute it renders the warrant invalid - whether the Commissioner of Police may approve persons as persons who may exercise the authority conferred by a warrant which has already been issued - whether statement that there were reasonable grounds for suspecting that the communications service was being or may be used by a person likely to commit a narcotics offence without specifying what the offence was 1s adequate - relevance of fact that person or persons whose telephone service 1s being intercepted will have no knowledge
of the interception.
Telecommunications Interception Act 1979 ss.20, 22 and 28
Crimes Act 1914 s.10
Judiciary Act 1903 s.39B Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 ss.23, 32, 33, 34 and 39.
REX FREDERICK JACKSON v. CHRISTOPHER WELLS & ORS
No. G80 of 1985 Smithers, Evatt and Morling Jd . 30 October 1985
Sydney.
toe.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW_S
) ) OQUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY ) ) )
NO. G80 of 1985
GENERAL DIVISION
BETWEEN: REX FREDERTCK JACKSON
Appellant
AND: CHRISTOPHER WELLES
First Respondent
AND: THE COMMISSIONER OF AUSTRALIAN FEDERAL
POLICE
Second Respondent
AND: JAMES EDWARD LOOMES
Third Respondent
Judges Making Order: Smithers, Evatt and Morling dd.
Date of Order: 30 October 1985 Where Made: Sydney.
MINUTE_OF ORDER
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
NOTE:
The appeal be dismissed with costs. Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of
the Federal Court Rules.
emrese ees
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA )
CORAM: DATED:
)
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY ) No. G80 of 1985 ) GENERAL DIVISION ) BETWEEN: REX FREDERICK JACKSON Appellant AND: CHRISTOPHER WELLS
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate