Re Porter, A. v. Ex parte Strachan, J.F. & Anor [1985] FCA 627
Federal Court of Australia
Full text
Select any passage to save a personal note with optional tags.
CATCHWORDS
Bankruptcy - costs - absconding debtor's warrant - whether
creditors entitled to costs - debtor arrested in Sydney - whether
conduct of creditors unreasonable so as to preclude them from
having costs of and incidental to return of debtor from Sydney to
Adelaide.
No. 882 of 1985
Re: ANTHONY PORTER Ex Parte JOHN FOSTER STRACHAN and DAVID
GRAHAM THOMAS
FORSTER J.
ADELAIDE
28 NOVEMBER 1985
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION
BANKRUPTCY DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF
)
)
)
)
) No. 882 of 1985
}
)
SOUTH AUSTRALIA
Re: ANTHONY PORTER
Debtor
Ex Parte:
JOHN FOSTER STRACHAN
and
DAVID GRAHAM THOMAS
Creditors
JUDGE MAKING ORDER: FORSTER J.
DATE OF ORDER: 28 NOVEMBER 1985
WHERE MADE: ADELAIDE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
l.
The debtor pay the costs of the creditors of and
incidental to the warrant of arrest including the return
of the debtor to Adelaide, those costs to be taxed.
Out of the sum of $1,500-00 held in the trust account of
the debtor's solicitors there be paid to Australian
Government Solicitor the sum of $606-90 for payment to
the Australian Federal Police.
The balance of the said sum is to await the result of
the taxation of the creditors' costs.
The costs of today are to be included in the costs to be
Paid by the debtor.
Settlement and entry of order is dealt with + in
Bankruptcy Rule 124.
sinw 7%
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
)
)
)
)
GENERAL DIVISION ) No. 882 of 1985
)
BANKRUPTCY DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF)
)
SOUTH AUSTRALIA
Re: ANTHONY PORTER
Debtor
Ex Parte:
JOHN FOSTER STRACHAN
and
DAVID GRAHAM THOMAS
Creditors
EX TEMPORE REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Forster J. : In this matter the creditors obtained from this
court the issue of an absconding debtor's warrant under the
Bankruptcy Act to arrest the debtor upon the footing that he was
leaving the jurisdiction for the purpose of avoiding paying the
judgment debt owing to them. I now have to consider the
question as to whether the creditors should be paid the costs of
their proceedings, that is to say the costs of the issue of the
warrant and the costs of the return of the debtor together with
an escorting police officer from Sydney to Adelaide in obedience
to the warrant.
. 2.
It is argued by Mr Martin for the debtor that whereas it
may be that the creditors should have the costs up to and
including the issue of the warrant, that they should not have the
costs of the return of the debtor from Sydney to Adelaide. It
seems to me, however, and this emerges - emerged really during
the discussions I had with Mr Martin when he was addressing me,
that once the warrant was issued unless there was some firm and
absolute payment of the money here, not just an undertaking to
pay it, or I wall probably pay it, or I will get it somewhere,
unless the money was actually paid here it cannot be fairly said
that the creditors were unreasonable in not attempting to stop
the execution of the warrant and the return of the debtor to
Adelaide.
Nothing has been shown which satisfies me that the
conduct of the creditors was unreasonable. Hard it might have
been, in fact it was, but unreasonable and improper, in my view,
it was not, and I think also that the debtur will have to pay the
costs of his return to Adelaide and the incidental costs of the
trip by a Commonwealth police officer because the warrant having
been issued, if the warrant was rightly issued, as I think it
was, the debtor's return to Adelaide followed almost inevitably.
I order that out of the sum of $1,500 held in the trust
account of Bowen, Paine, Morris and Company, the solicitors for
the debtor, the sum of $606-90 be paid out to the Australian
Government Solicitors for payment to the Australian Federal
Police and that the balance await the result of the taxation of
costs - of the creditors' costs - and that the costs of today's
proceedings are to be included in the costs to he paid by the
debtor to the creditors.
I certify that this and
the -2 preceding pages are
a true copy of the Reasons
for dudgment of Mr Justice
Forster.
Associate fe ar okegx
Dated: af 44 NYoverse- LES
Related laws
No related documents linked yet.
You've got 21 of 22 free Acts left this visit. Sign up anytime for Facts, Related, and study briefs too.