Federal Court of Australia
LoS
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
GENERAL DIVISION
BANKRUPTCY DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF
NEW SOUTH WALES AND
THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY
Verve verve
DISTRIBUTION
Nos. W237 &W338 of
RE: SUSAN MARY MAPLER AND WAYNE LINDSAY MARLER EX PARTE: THE BANKRUPT CORAM: JACKSON J. DATE: 20 December 1985 PLACE: SYDNEY MINUTES OF ORDER THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. Each applicant be discharged from bankruptcy.
NOTE:
Settlement and entry of orders 15 dealt with in Crder 124 of the Bankruptcy Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA )
GENERAL DIVISION )
BANKRUPTCY DISTPICT OF THE STATE OF ) Nos. W337 & W338 of 19284
NEW SOUTH WALES AND )
THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TES: "TORY )
RE; SUSAN MARY MARLER AND WAYNE LINDSAY MAPLER
EX PARTE: THE BANKPUPT CORAM: JACKSON J. DATE: 290 December 1985 PLACE: SYDNEY
PEASONS FOR JUDGMENT
The unexpected brevity of other matters with which I was to deal teday has given me time to cead the material again. In consequence of so doing, I have formed a view which enables me to deal with the matter immediately and I shall now
proceed to do so.
The applicants, who are husband and wife, were made
bankrupt on their own petitions by sequestration orders mad
ul v
on 27 April 1984 and Mr D.L. Nicholl was appcinted trustee of
G
their estates. Mr Nicholl had previously acted as trustee
pursuant to an authority under s.188 of the Bankruptcy Act
1966 given in May 1383.
The male applicant was admitted as a solicitor in 1969 and practised as such until 1980 when he became a barrister. In 1981 the applicants purchased a property, Tynwald, at New Norfolk, Tasmania with a view to converting the property to colonial style guest accommodation and it was that venture which in the end led to the appointment of a
trustee and finally making of sequestration orders.
It had been intended that Tynwald, as well as being the site of the business would also be the future family cesidence. The venture proved unsuccessful, hnowever, because oF a number of cost factors referred to in the affidavit of the male applicant. Thereafter the mal2 applicant endeavoured to prop up the financial situation by returning to practices at the bar in Sydney and the applicants attempted to sell Tynwald
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate