Bingham, William Martin v Gallagher, Norman Leslie [1985] FCA 694
Federal Court of Australia
Full text
Select any passage to save a personal note with optional tags.
LAG /OS" (e4)
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA )
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY ) NO. V1l of 1985
INDUSTRIAL DIVISION )
oO
g
atae]
te)
|
HIS HONOUR:
BETWEEN: WILLIAM MARTIN BINGHAM
Applicant
AND: NORMAN LESLIE GALLAGHER,
THE AUSTRALIAN BUILDING
CONSTRUCTION EMPLOVERS"
AND BUILDERS LABOURERS
FEDERATION AND DAVID
PILLAR
Respondents
Mr. Justice Jenkinson
Melbourne
17 December, 1985
On 13 December 1985 orders were made by consent of
all parties to this proceeding that the applicant
have leave to discontinue the proceeding, that
certain interlocutory orders made by Burchett J. on
3 September 1985 be discharged, and that there be
no order as to costs, nor any liability on the
applicant for costs.
I was on that occasion asked by the applicant's
solicitor to certify in the terms of section
132H(2) of the Conciliation and Arbitration Act
1904, and the legal representatives of the other
parties expressed their client's acquiescence in my
2.
acceding to that request.
Having examined the documents filed in the
proceeding and having read the reasons given by
Burchett J. for the interlocutory orders he made on
3 September 1985, I am prepared, if the applicant
does discontinue the proceeding, to certify,
pursuant to section 132H(2), in these terms: "The
Federal Court of Australia certifies pursuant to
sub-section 132H(2) of the Conciliation and
Arbitration Act 1904 that William Martin Bingham,
the person who in the proceeding in the court in
the Industrial Division, numbered V1ll of 1985, in
the Victorian District Registry made application
under sub-section 132B(5) of the said Act for a
declaration that Norman Leslie Gallagher is not
eligible to continue to be a candidate for election
to the office of Branch Secretary of the Victorian
branch of the Australian Building Construction
Employees and Builders Labourers Federation, an
organization registered pursuant to the said Act,
was at the time when the application was made a
member of the said organization and that the said
William Martin Bingham acted reasonably in so
applying, notwithstanding that the court did not
find in the said proceeding that a person is not or
was not eligible to become or to continue to be a
candidate for election or to be elected or
appointed to an otfice within the said organization
MR. I. WALL:
HIS HONOUR:
or that a person has ceased to hold an office
within the said organization."
It may be that Burchett J. could be said to have
made a finding of a description specified in
section 132H(2) for the purpose of determining
what, if any, interlocutory order should be made
pending the determination of the application, but
in my opinion a conclusion of fact reached only for
that purpose does not fall within the meaning of
the word "find" in the sub-section.
Do you appear for Mr. Bingham?
Yes, your Honour, I appear as solicitor for him.
When the notice of discontinuance has been filed,
if you let my associate know, then a_ certificate
can be drawn up.
Related laws
No related documents linked yet.
You've got 21 of 22 free Acts left this visit. Sign up anytime for Facts, Related, and study briefs too.