Federal Court of Australia
CATCHWORODS
PRACTICE - security for costs ~ claim to recover moneys invested
with respondent - ability to obtain costs from amount invested - security refused.
INJUNCTON - Mareva - whether should be varied to enable payment of costs of proceedings.
WAREA PTY. LTD. & ANOR.
v. WATERLOO INDUSTRIES PTY. LTD. & ORS. G6 OF 1986
PINCUS J. BRISBANE 7 MARCH 1986
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY ) QLD G6 of 1986 GENERAL DIVISION )
~
BETWEEN: WAREA PITY. LTD.
First Applicant AND: STRIPE LIMITED
Second Applicant
AND: WATERLOO INDUSTRIES PTY LTD & ORS trading as DELTRITE FINANCIAL SERVICES
First Respondent
AND: WILLIAM LEONARD ARMSTRONG
Second Respondent
AND: LISA N. VIRBA
Third Respondent
AND: ROBERT WAYNE COLLINS
Fourth Respondent
MINUTES OF ORDER
JUDGE MAKING ORDER: PINCUS d. DATE OF ORDER: 7 MARCH 1986
WHERE MADE: BRISBANE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION )
ES
QLD Ge of 1986
BETWEEN: WAREA PTY. LTD.
First Applicant
AND: STRIPE LIMITED
Second Applicant
AND: WATERLOO INDUSTRIES PTY LTD & ORS trading as DELTRITE FINANCIAL SERVICES
First Respondent
AND: WILLIAM LEONARD ARMSTRONG
Second Respondent
AND: LISA N. VIRBA
Third Respondent
AND: ROBERT WAYNE COLLINS
Fourth Respondent
DATE OF HEARING: 7 MARCH 1986
DATE JUDGMENT DELIVERED: 7 MARCH 1986
COUNSEL:
- for the applicant Mr. Morris instructed by Cooper, Grace & Ward for the applicants
for the respondent Mr. Boughen instructed by
Cannan & Peterson for the fourth respondent
J. A. LYONS ASSOCIATE TO PINCUS J.
7 MARCH 1986
te
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
l.
NOTE:
The injunction granted by Pincus Jd. on 4 March, 1986 be varied by inserting at the end of paragraph 1 the words: "except that the fifth respondent may make payment to Messrs Clarke and Kann, solicitors of Brisbane, of sums up to a total of $10,000 to be paid into the trust account of such solicitors and applied towards, and only towards, payment of the costs and outlays of those solicitors in and about resistance to the claim of the application in this matter no. G6/1986 provided that such solicitors may, if they see fit, invest the balance of the funds from time to time in the name of their firm in interest bearing securities or deposits."
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate