Federal Court of Australia
ofl
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
) ) VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY ) No. V. 6 of 1986 ) )
INDUSTRIAL DIVISTON
BETWEEN:
~ NORMAN MARTIN and
LEWIS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
pry. OTD.
29 MAY, 1986 KEELY J.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Norman Martin (the prosecutor) laid an information
alleging that on 14 February 1986 Lewis Construction Company Pty. Ltd. (the defendant) had dismissed him by reason of the circumstance that he was a member of the Australian Building Construction Employees and Builders Labourers' Federation (the Federation), an organization of employees then yegistered under the Conciliation and Arbitration Act (the Act). The information was laid and filed on 24 February 1986, on which date a summons was issued, containing
particulars of the charge.
Fe prenwene
rt ere ee eee on
On 13 May 1986 three subpoenas for the production of documents were issued, at the request of the defendant's solicitors, addresséd to the General Secretary of the Federation, the Secretary of the Victorian Branch of the Federation and the Secretary of the N.S.W. Branch of the Federation. The court was— informed by counsel for the parties and the persons to whom the subpoenas were addressed that those subpoenas were in identical terms. The subpoenas
sought the production of a large number of documents which
were identified or described in 49 paragraphs in a schedule
to each subpoena. Paragraphs 1-41 {both inclusive) identified certain documents and paragraphs 42-49 (both
inclusive) described documents by reference to a class.
On 15 May 1986 three further subpoenas for the production of documents, addressed in the same way, were issued at the request of the defendant's solicitors. Those subpoenas, which were in identical terms, sought the production of documents described in three paragraphs by reference to a class of documents. It was made clear to the
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate