Federal Court of Australia
sen
we ep ee
orm Beatpe te
NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA )
)
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY } No. G258 of 1936
GENERAL DIVISTON
EETWEEN:
) }
M. & G. WEHBE BROTHERS PTY. LIMITED
Applicant
CALTEX OIL (AUSTRALIA) PITY. LIMITED
Respondent
MINUTES OF ORDER
Judge making order: Beaumont, J.
Date order made:
Where made: Sydney
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
3 July 1986
1. Note that the applicant renews its undertaking as
to damages.
ta
Note that the
respondent renews its existing
undertaking to the Court until further order.
Gs
Dey
proceedings.
Reserve liberty to apply cn two days' notice.
Costs of this interim application be costs in the
Note: Fattlement and entry of orders 15 dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
-wp-
, NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA ) )
: NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY ) No. G258 of 1986
) . : GENERAL DIVISION ) -
¥ -
' BETWEEN : M._& G. WEHBE BROTHERS PTY. LIMITED : Applicant
7 AND: CALTEX OIL (AUSTRALIA) PTY. LIMITED
pes
Respondent
wager
f
CORAM: Beaumont, J. DATED: 8 July 1986
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
The applicant seeks interlocutory relief that, pending the final hearing of these proceedings, the respondent continue to deliver to the applicant petroleum omroducts to the retail outlet conducted by the respondent at the premises situated at
110 Canterbury Road, Bankstown.
In his affidavit sworn 29 June 1986. Mr. M.N. Wehbe, a director of the applicant. says that in early May 1986, the respondent offered to enter into a Reseller Supply Contract and Collateral Agreement for the supply of petroleum products. This contract and this agreement were intended to renew similar
previous arrangements which were about to expire by effluxion of
y ' "sf we ek ne ater Eat tena no Peet ame oe
time. On 13 May 1986, the applicant executed a counterpart of these agreements which were to subsist for a period of one year at least. However, by letter dated 16 June 19846. the respondent informed the applicant that it did not propose to renew the
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate