Hughes, K.J. v. Western Australian Cricket Association & Ors [1986] FCA 269

Ss thee

Tw ~

tian wt

ore

L69

Practice and Procedure - claim under Trade Practices Act and accrued jurisdiction - interrogatories administered by applicant outside time fixed by Court - objection by respondents to answer interrogatories - interrogatories numbering in excess of 200 and including many to which objection may properly be taken - whether interrogatories oppressive - whether likelihood of injustice to

the applicant if interrogatories not answered

Federal Court Rules 0.16 r.1

KIMBERLEY JOHN HUGHES v. WESTERN AUSTRALIAN CRICKET ASSOCIATION CINC.) AND OTHERS and MI. LAWLEY DISTRICT CRICKET CLUB (INC. ) AND OTHERS and LESLIE ANNISON (sued on behalf of himself and all

other members of the Scarborough Cricket Club) AND OTHERS and KEVIN MORRIS TAYLFORTH (sued on behalf of himself and all other

members of the Cricket Council of Western Australia Cricket Association (Inc.))

No. WA G14 of 1986

TOOHEY J. PERTH

16 JULY 1986

It gd e- \ bh oY - ~ oe _F Ne t - a

eae ee en eee

aoe at

a ee et eet ee

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION

JUDGE MAKING ORDER:

DATE OF ORDER: WHERE MADE:

No. WA G14 of 1986

wwe

BETWEEN

KIMBERLEY JOHN HUGHES Applicant

and

WESTERN AUSTRALIAN CRICKET ASSOCTATION (INC.) AND OTHERS

First Respondent

and

MI. LAWLEY DISTRICT CRICKET CLUB (INC, )

AND OTHERS

Second Respondent

and

LESLIE ANNISON (sued on behalf of

himself and all other members of the Scarborough Cricket Club) AND OTHERS

Third Respondent

and

KEVIN MORRIS TAYLFORTH (sued on behalf of himself and all other members of the Cricket Council of Western Australia Cricket Association (Inc.))

Fourth Respondent

MINUTE OF ORDER

TOOHEY J. 16 July 1986

Perth

Pee ene aS

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1.

The claim in para.3 of the applicant's minute of proposed

directions filed 4 July 1986 is dismissed.

The applicant pay the respondents' costs of the claim.