Federal Court of Australia
- _ ~
CATCHWORDS
Trade Practices - misleading and deceptive conduct - sale of business ~ claim by guarantor - whether able to prove loss by
giving guarantee - whether loss separate and distinct from that suffered by contracting party -~ representations not misleading - reliance on own investigations - representations
in form of agreements not included in written contract.
Trade Practices Act 1974 ss.52, 82, 87
Gould v. Vaggelas (1984) 56 A.L.R. 31
Bill Acceptance Corporation Ltd. v. GWA Ltd. (1983) 50 A.L.R. 242.
GEORGE TRINGAS and STAVROULA TRINGAS Applicants
and
ANSETT TRANSPORT INDUSTRIES (OPERATIONS) PTY. LTD. and ANSETT TRANSPORT INDUSTRIES LIMITED Respondents
and
ANSETT TRANSPORT INDUSTRIES (OPERATIONS) PTY. LTD. Cross~Applicant
and
GEORGE TRINGAS and STAVROULA TRINGAS Cross-Respondents
V. No. G 99 of 1982
NORTHROP J.
8 AUGUST 1986 MELBOURNE
* Not considered appropriate for further distribution.
- , LiaetTen Di STRiRUT ION
ware ge ne
ya
pepe
w
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V. No. G 99 of 1982
wee eww
GENERAL DIVISION
GEORGE TRINGAS and STAVROULA TRINGAS Applicants
and
ANSETT TRANSPORT INDUSTRIES (OPERATIONS) PTY. LTD. and ANSETT TRANSPORT INDUSTRIES LIMITED Respondents
and
ANSETT TRANSPORT INDUSTRIES (QPERATIONS) PTY. LTD. Cross-Applicant
and
GEORGE TRINGAS and STAVROULA TRINGAS Cross—-Respondents
COURT: NORTHROP J. DATE: 8 AUGUST 1986
PLACE: MELBOURNE
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
A number of unusual features affect these proceedings and it will be helpful to set out in broad outline the background facts. At all material times Ansett
Transport Industries (Operations) Pty. Ltd. ("Ansett
Operations") was a corporation under the Trade Practices Act
1974 ("the Act"). Among other activities Ansett Operations
conducted the business of providing road passenger services
under the business mame of Ansett Pioneer. Those services included tourist coach travel packages, tours and express services. In addition to providing those services, Ansett Operations carried on the business of travel agents from retail outlets in the capital cities of Australia. Among those were retail outlets situate at 147 King Street, Sydney, 59 Swanston Street, Melbourne and 37 St. Georges Terrace, Perth. At each of these retail outlets Ansett Operations carried on travel agency businesses from which they sold to members of the public travel services both international and domestic including the coach services provided under the name Ansett Pioneer. In conducting those travel agency businesses, Ansett Operations were in competition with other travel agency businesses, some of which also sold to members of the public coach services provided under the name Ansett
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate