Federal Court of Australia
B53/ %6
NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY No. G.247 of 1985
GENERAL DIVISION
BETWEEN: OLIVER ROLAND EDMUND
COLMAN and
SUSAN CLARE COLMAN
Applicants ~
AND: LINCOLN HUNT AUSTRALIA
PTY LIMITED First Respondent RICHARD HAWKE Second Respondent
JACOB FEDOR DUBINSKI-HUNT
Third Respondent
CORAM: WILCOX J 3 PLACE: SYDNEY DATE: 11 AUGUST 1986
MINUTES OF ORDER
ol eeciealiataaaenan ateeniaitcen iar i lea
te
omer
re pe
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: ~
Note:
Judgment be entered against each of the first and
third respondents in the sum of sixteen thousand
dollars ($16,000.00) together with interest in the
sum of two thousand eight hundred dollars
($2,800.00).
The first and third respondents pay to the applicants
their costs of these proceedings.
Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
Vuoaee
my me,
hae ata
yo
= wees
ee
mae ees
NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY No. G.247 of 1985
wwe we
GENERAL DIVISION
BETWEEN: OLIVER ROLAND EDMUND COLMAN and
SUSAN CLARE COLMAN"
Applicants
AND: LINCOLN HUNT AUSTRALIA
PTY LIMITED First Respondent RICHARD HAWKE Second Respondent
JACOB FEDOR DUBINSKI~HUNT
Third Respondent
wdlideh tl u
CORAM: _ WILCOX J PLACE: SYDNEY DATE: 11 AUGUST 1986
EXTEMPORE REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
This is an application brought under s.52 of the-
Trade Practices Act 1974. The applicants Oliver Roland Edmund Colman and Susan Clare Colman made two deposits with the first respondent, Lincoln Hunt Australia Pty Limited pursuant to certain statements made to them, both orally and in documentary form, regarding so-called investments. The first
deposit was made on 8 May 1985 in the sum of $8,000. The
second payment was made on 27 June 1985 in the same amount.
The second respondent to the proceedings, Richard Hawke, was employed by the first respondent as Chief ° Executive, Financial Services Division. He played some part in the persuasion of Mr Colman, who made the relevant decisions on behalf of himself and his wife to invest money
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate